[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1465403688-17098-12-git-send-email-boris.brezillon@free-electrons.com>
Date: Wed, 8 Jun 2016 18:34:46 +0200
From: Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@...e-electrons.com>
To: Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@...il.com>,
linux-pwm@...r.kernel.org, Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>,
Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@...il.com>
Cc: Heiko Stuebner <heiko@...ech.de>,
linux-rockchip@...ts.infradead.org,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Pawel Moll <pawel.moll@....com>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
Ian Campbell <ijc+devicetree@...lion.org.uk>,
Kumar Gala <galak@...eaurora.org>, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Milo Kim <milo.kim@...com>,
Doug Anderson <dianders@...gle.com>,
Caesar Wang <wxt@...k-chips.com>,
Stephen Barber <smbarber@...omium.org>,
Brian Norris <briannorris@...omium.org>,
Ajit Pal Singh <ajitpal.singh@...com>,
Srinivas Kandagatla <srinivas.kandagatla@...il.com>,
Maxime Coquelin <maxime.coquelin@...com>,
Patrice Chotard <patrice.chotard@...com>, kernel@...inux.com,
Laxman Dewangan <ldewangan@...dia.com>,
Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@...e-electrons.com>
Subject: [PATCH v2 11/13] regulator: pwm: Retrieve correct voltage
The continuous PWM voltage regulator is caching the voltage value in
the ->volt_uV field. While most of the time this value should reflect the
real voltage, sometime it can be sightly different if the PWM device
rounded the set_duty_cycle request.
Moreover, this value is not valid until someone has modified the regulator
output.
Remove the ->volt_uV field and always rely on the PWM state to calculate
the regulator output.
Signed-off-by: Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@...e-electrons.com>
Reviewed-by: Brian Norris <briannorris@...omium.org>
Tested-by: Brian Norris <briannorris@...omium.org>
---
Mark,
I know you already added your Tested-by/Acked-by tags on this patch
but this version has slightly change and is now making use of the
pwm_get_relative_duty_cycle() helper instead of manually converting
the absolute duty_cycle value into a relative one.
---
drivers/regulator/pwm-regulator.c | 12 ++++++------
1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/regulator/pwm-regulator.c b/drivers/regulator/pwm-regulator.c
index 8c56e16..c39ecd1 100644
--- a/drivers/regulator/pwm-regulator.c
+++ b/drivers/regulator/pwm-regulator.c
@@ -35,9 +35,6 @@ struct pwm_regulator_data {
struct regulator_ops ops;
int state;
-
- /* Continuous voltage */
- int volt_uV;
};
struct pwm_voltages {
@@ -135,8 +132,13 @@ static int pwm_regulator_is_enabled(struct regulator_dev *dev)
static int pwm_regulator_get_voltage(struct regulator_dev *rdev)
{
struct pwm_regulator_data *drvdata = rdev_get_drvdata(rdev);
+ int min_uV = rdev->constraints->min_uV;
+ int diff = rdev->constraints->max_uV - min_uV;
+ struct pwm_state pstate;
- return drvdata->volt_uV;
+ pwm_get_state(drvdata->pwm, &pstate);
+
+ return min_uV + pwm_get_relative_duty_cycle(&pstate, diff);
}
static int pwm_regulator_set_voltage(struct regulator_dev *rdev,
@@ -162,8 +164,6 @@ static int pwm_regulator_set_voltage(struct regulator_dev *rdev,
return ret;
}
- drvdata->volt_uV = min_uV;
-
/* Delay required by PWM regulator to settle to the new voltage */
usleep_range(ramp_delay, ramp_delay + 1000);
--
2.7.4
Powered by blists - more mailing lists