[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <575919F3.7020807@ti.com>
Date: Thu, 9 Jun 2016 10:25:39 +0300
From: Roger Quadros <rogerq@...com>
To: Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>, <peter.chen@...escale.com>
CC: <balbi@...nel.org>, <tony@...mide.com>,
<gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>, <dan.j.williams@...el.com>,
<mathias.nyman@...ux.intel.com>, <Joao.Pinto@...opsys.com>,
<sergei.shtylyov@...entembedded.com>, <jun.li@...escale.com>,
<grygorii.strashko@...com>, <yoshihiro.shimoda.uh@...esas.com>,
<robh@...nel.org>, <nsekhar@...com>, <b-liu@...com>,
<linux-usb@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-omap@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v9 11/14] usb: otg: use dev_dbg() instead of VDBG()
On 08/06/16 18:10, Joe Perches wrote:
> On Wed, 2016-06-08 at 12:03 +0300, Roger Quadros wrote:
>> Now that we have a device reference in struct usb_otg
>> let's use dev_dbg() for debug messages.
>
> dev_vdbg vs dev_dbg
>
> The patch subject and commit message don't match the code changes.
Indeed. Will fix it. Thanks.
>
>> diff --git a/drivers/usb/common/usb-otg-fsm.c b/drivers/usb/common/usb-otg-fsm.c
> []
>> @@ -44,8 +37,9 @@ static int otg_set_protocol(struct otg_fsm *fsm, int protocol)
>> int ret = 0;
>>
>> if (fsm->protocol != protocol) {
>> - VDBG("Changing role fsm->protocol= %d; new protocol= %d\n",
>> - fsm->protocol, protocol);
>> + dev_vdbg(otg->dev,
>> + "Changing role fsm->protocol= %d; new protocol= %d\n",
>> + fsm->protocol, protocol);
>
> etc...
>
--
cheers,
-roger
Powered by blists - more mailing lists