[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <57592220.9030201@ti.com>
Date: Thu, 9 Jun 2016 11:00:32 +0300
From: Roger Quadros <rogerq@...com>
To: Krzysztof Kozlowski <k.kozlowski@...sung.com>,
MyungJoo Ham <myungjoo.ham@...sung.com>,
Chanwoo Choi <cw00.choi@...sung.com>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
Kukjin Kim <kgene@...nel.org>,
Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@...sung.com>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
<linux-samsung-soc@...r.kernel.org>
CC: Peter Chen <peter.chen@...escale.com>,
"Ivan T. Ivanov" <iivanov@...sol.com>,
Felipe Balbi <balbi@...nel.org>, <kishon@...com>,
Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <b.zolnierkie@...sung.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC v4 2/7] Revert "extcon: usb-gpio: switch to use pm wakeirq
apis"
-balbi@ti
+balbi@...nel
Hi,
On 08/06/16 16:48, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> This reverts commit 8106e404174253639731cc30a44f5b3ab764c5b7.
The above commit id is not present in v4.7-rc1 and this patch doesn't apply properly.
Can you please rebase this series on v4.7-rc1?
>
> When using PM wakeirq API only one wakeup IRQ can be set. However the
> driver will support also VBUS GPIO so we need two wakeup interrupts.
> ---
> drivers/extcon/extcon-usb-gpio.c | 19 +++++++++++++------
> 1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/extcon/extcon-usb-gpio.c b/drivers/extcon/extcon-usb-gpio.c
> index 2512660dc4b9..a36aab007022 100644
> --- a/drivers/extcon/extcon-usb-gpio.c
> +++ b/drivers/extcon/extcon-usb-gpio.c
> @@ -24,7 +24,6 @@
> #include <linux/module.h>
> #include <linux/of_gpio.h>
> #include <linux/platform_device.h>
> -#include <linux/pm_wakeirq.h>
> #include <linux/slab.h>
> #include <linux/workqueue.h>
> #include <linux/acpi.h>
> @@ -143,8 +142,7 @@ static int usb_extcon_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> }
>
> platform_set_drvdata(pdev, info);
> - device_init_wakeup(dev, true);
> - dev_pm_set_wake_irq(dev, info->id_irq);
> + device_init_wakeup(dev, 1);
>
> /* Perform initial detection */
> usb_extcon_detect_cable(&info->wq_detcable.work);
> @@ -158,9 +156,6 @@ static int usb_extcon_remove(struct platform_device *pdev)
>
> cancel_delayed_work_sync(&info->wq_detcable);
>
> - dev_pm_clear_wake_irq(&pdev->dev);
> - device_init_wakeup(&pdev->dev, false);
> -
> return 0;
> }
>
> @@ -170,6 +165,12 @@ static int usb_extcon_suspend(struct device *dev)
> struct usb_extcon_info *info = dev_get_drvdata(dev);
> int ret = 0;
>
> + if (device_may_wakeup(dev)) {
> + ret = enable_irq_wake(info->id_irq);
> + if (ret)
> + return ret;
> + }
> +
> /*
> * We don't want to process any IRQs after this point
> * as GPIOs used behind I2C subsystem might not be
> @@ -185,6 +186,12 @@ static int usb_extcon_resume(struct device *dev)
> struct usb_extcon_info *info = dev_get_drvdata(dev);
> int ret = 0;
>
> + if (device_may_wakeup(dev)) {
> + ret = disable_irq_wake(info->id_irq);
> + if (ret)
> + return ret;
> + }
> +
> enable_irq(info->id_irq);
> if (!device_may_wakeup(dev))
> queue_delayed_work(system_power_efficient_wq,
>
--
cheers,
-roger
Powered by blists - more mailing lists