[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-id: <5759247E.6060901@samsung.com>
Date: Thu, 09 Jun 2016 10:10:38 +0200
From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <k.kozlowski@...sung.com>
To: Roger Quadros <rogerq@...com>,
MyungJoo Ham <myungjoo.ham@...sung.com>,
Chanwoo Choi <cw00.choi@...sung.com>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
Kukjin Kim <kgene@...nel.org>,
Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@...sung.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-samsung-soc@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Peter Chen <peter.chen@...escale.com>,
"Ivan T. Ivanov" <iivanov@...sol.com>,
Felipe Balbi <balbi@...nel.org>, kishon@...com,
Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <b.zolnierkie@...sung.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC v4 2/7] Revert
"extcon: usb-gpio: switch to use pm wakeirq apis"
On 06/09/2016 10:00 AM, Roger Quadros wrote:
> -balbi@ti
> +balbi@...nel
>
> Hi,
>
> On 08/06/16 16:48, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
>> This reverts commit 8106e404174253639731cc30a44f5b3ab764c5b7.
>
> The above commit id is not present in v4.7-rc1 and this patch doesn't apply properly.
> Can you please rebase this series on v4.7-rc1?
The commit is present in extcon tree for v4.8. The extcon patches will
be applied (probably) to that tree so what is the point of rebasing on
v4.7-rc1?
Also the point of this particular patch is to show that previous change
should be just dropped. Don't replace things to complicated devm-like
functions just to simplify one path in the driver...
Best regards,
Krzysztof
Powered by blists - more mailing lists