linux-kernel - Re: [RFC v4 2/7] Revert "extcon: usb-gpio: switch to use pm wakeirq apis"

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Thu, 9 Jun 2016 11:20:29 +0300
From:	Roger Quadros <rogerq@...com>
To:	Krzysztof Kozlowski <k.kozlowski@...sung.com>,
	MyungJoo Ham <myungjoo.ham@...sung.com>,
	Chanwoo Choi <cw00.choi@...sung.com>,
	Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
	Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
	Kukjin Kim <kgene@...nel.org>,
	Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@...sung.com>,
	<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
	<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
	<linux-samsung-soc@...r.kernel.org>
CC:	Peter Chen <peter.chen@...escale.com>,
	"Ivan T. Ivanov" <iivanov@...sol.com>,
	Felipe Balbi <balbi@...nel.org>, <kishon@...com>,
	Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <b.zolnierkie@...sung.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC v4 2/7] Revert "extcon: usb-gpio: switch to use pm wakeirq
 apis"

On 09/06/16 11:10, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> On 06/09/2016 10:00 AM, Roger Quadros wrote:
>> -balbi@ti
>> +balbi@...nel
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> On 08/06/16 16:48, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
>>> This reverts commit 8106e404174253639731cc30a44f5b3ab764c5b7.
>>
>> The above commit id is not present in v4.7-rc1 and this patch doesn't apply properly.
>> Can you please rebase this series on v4.7-rc1?
> 
> The commit is present in extcon tree for v4.8. The extcon patches will
> be applied (probably) to that tree so what is the point of rebasing on
> v4.7-rc1?

OK, please ignore my comment. Would be nice if you mention in the cover letter
which tree the series is based on.

> 
> Also the point of this particular patch is to show that previous change
> should be just dropped. Don't replace things to complicated devm-like
> functions just to simplify one path in the driver...
> 

--
cheers,
0roger