linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] cpufreq: governor: Drop gov_cancel

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAJZ5v0i5Tf+KsLRSO7A0PanPjG1XenzLpZopfOAYH-3cLbjTbg@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Thu, 9 Jun 2016 14:21:33 +0200
From:	"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>
To:	Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>
Cc:	"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>,
	Linux PM list <linux-pm@...r.kernel.org>,
	Srinivas Pandruvada <srinivas.pandruvada@...ux.intel.com>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] cpufreq: governor: Drop gov_cancel_work()

On Thu, Jun 9, 2016 at 5:21 AM, Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org> wrote:
> On 09-06-16, 01:45, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
>> From: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com>
>>
>> There's no reason for gov_cancel_work() to exist at all, as it only
>> has one caller and the only thing done by that caller is to invoke
>> gov_cancel_work().
>>
>> Accordingly, drop gov_cancel_work() and move its contents to the
>> caller.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com>
>> ---
>>  drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq_governor.c |   19 +++++++------------
>>  1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
>
> Acked-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>

Thanks!

> I am wondering what happened to your other patches around the governor callbacks
> and why weren't they applied yet :)

They are in linux-next now, aren't they?