linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] cpufreq: governor: Drop gov_cancel

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20160609032100.GB9356@vireshk-i7>
Date:	Thu, 9 Jun 2016 08:51:00 +0530
From:	Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>
To:	"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>
Cc:	Linux PM list <linux-pm@...r.kernel.org>,
	Srinivas Pandruvada <srinivas.pandruvada@...ux.intel.com>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] cpufreq: governor: Drop gov_cancel_work()

On 09-06-16, 01:45, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> From: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com>
> 
> There's no reason for gov_cancel_work() to exist at all, as it only
> has one caller and the only thing done by that caller is to invoke
> gov_cancel_work().
> 
> Accordingly, drop gov_cancel_work() and move its contents to the
> caller.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com>
> ---
>  drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq_governor.c |   19 +++++++------------
>  1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)

Acked-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>

I am wondering what happened to your other patches around the governor callbacks
and why weren't they applied yet :)

-- 
viresh