[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-id: <5759633E.7090706@samsung.com>
Date: Thu, 09 Jun 2016 21:38:22 +0900
From: Jaehoon Chung <jh80.chung@...sung.com>
To: Seung-Woo Kim <sw0312.kim@...sung.com>, ulf.hansson@...aro.org,
linux-mmc@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mmc: dw_mmc: remove UBSAN warning in dw_mci_setup_bus()
Hi Seung-Woo,
On 06/08/2016 01:07 PM, Seung-Woo Kim wrote:
> This patch removes following UBSAN warnings in dw_mci_setup_bus().
> The warnings are caused because of shift with more than 31 on 32
> bit variable, so this patch fixes to shift only for less than 32.
>
> UBSAN: Undefined behaviour in drivers/mmc/host/dw_mmc.c:1102:14
> shift exponent 250 is too large for 32-bit type 'unsigned int'
> Call trace:
> [<ffffff90080908a8>] dump_backtrace+0x0/0x380
> [<ffffff9008090c3c>] show_stack+0x14/0x20
> [<ffffff90087457b8>] dump_stack+0xe0/0x120
> [<ffffff90087b1360>] ubsan_epilogue+0x18/0x68
> [<ffffff90087b1a94>] __ubsan_handle_shift_out_of_bounds+0x18c/0x1bc
> [<ffffff9008d89cb8>] dw_mci_setup_bus+0x3a0/0x438
> [...]
>
> UBSAN: Undefined behaviour in drivers/mmc/host/dw_mmc.c:1132:27
> shift exponent 250 is too large for 32-bit type 'unsigned int'
> Call trace:
> [<ffffff90080908a8>] dump_backtrace+0x0/0x380
> [<ffffff9008090c3c>] show_stack+0x14/0x20
> [<ffffff90087457b8>] dump_stack+0xe0/0x120
> [<ffffff90087b1360>] ubsan_epilogue+0x18/0x68
> [<ffffff90087b1a94>] __ubsan_handle_shift_out_of_bounds+0x18c/0x1bc
> [<ffffff9008d89c9c>] dw_mci_setup_bus+0x384/0x438
The below message can be discarded.
> [<ffffff9008d89ed4>] dw_mci_set_ios+0x184/0x798
> [<ffffff9008d550ac>] mmc_power_up+0x11c/0x260
> [<ffffff9008d56b78>] mmc_start_host+0x88/0x100
> [<ffffff9008d583f4>] mmc_add_host+0x6c/0x128
> [<ffffff9008d88f90>] dw_mci_probe+0x1088/0x1750
> [<ffffff9008d8caa8>] dw_mci_pltfm_register+0x108/0x178
> [<ffffff9008d8dae4>] dw_mci_exynos_probe+0x4c/0x88
> [<ffffff9008a03838>] platform_drv_probe+0x78/0x180
> [<ffffff90089fe9fc>] driver_probe_device+0x144/0x460
> [<ffffff90089fee0c>] __driver_attach+0xf4/0x140
> [<ffffff90089fad98>] bus_for_each_dev+0xf0/0x160
> [<ffffff90089fdc9c>] driver_attach+0x34/0x58
> [<ffffff90089fd3e0>] bus_add_driver+0x2c0/0x398
> [<ffffff9008a00924>] driver_register+0xbc/0x1e0
> [<ffffff9008a02a94>] __platform_driver_register+0x84/0xa8
> [<ffffff9009dd5730>] dw_mci_exynos_pltfm_driver_init+0x18/0x20
> [<ffffff9008082df8>] do_one_initcall+0xa0/0x2c8
> [<ffffff9009d81780>] kernel_init_freeable+0x52c/0x5dc
> [<ffffff9009519844>] kernel_init+0x1c/0xf8
> [<ffffff9008086e10>] ret_from_fork+0x10/0x40
>
> Signed-off-by: Seung-Woo Kim <sw0312.kim@...sung.com>
> ---
> drivers/mmc/host/dw_mmc.c | 5 +++--
> 1 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/mmc/host/dw_mmc.c b/drivers/mmc/host/dw_mmc.c
> index 2cc6123..dff045e 100644
> --- a/drivers/mmc/host/dw_mmc.c
> +++ b/drivers/mmc/host/dw_mmc.c
> @@ -1099,7 +1099,8 @@ static void dw_mci_setup_bus(struct dw_mci_slot *slot, bool force_clkinit)
>
> div = (host->bus_hz != clock) ? DIV_ROUND_UP(div, 2) : 0;
>
> - if ((clock << div) != slot->__clk_old || force_clkinit)
> + if (((div < 32) ? (clock << div) : 0) != slot->__clk_old ||
Well, we don't expect that clock is 0.
if clock is 0, it should be passed to " if (!clock)"..
During initializing card, clock is 400KHz or less..I understood what you want to fix.
But I taught this is not correct.
> + force_clkinit)
> dev_info(&slot->mmc->class_dev,
> "Bus speed (slot %d) = %dHz (slot req %dHz, actual %dHZ div = %d)\n",
> slot->id, host->bus_hz, clock,
> @@ -1129,7 +1130,7 @@ static void dw_mci_setup_bus(struct dw_mci_slot *slot, bool force_clkinit)
> mci_send_cmd(slot, sdmmc_cmd_bits, 0);
>
> /* keep the clock with reflecting clock dividor */
> - slot->__clk_old = clock << div;
> + slot->__clk_old = (div < 32) ? (clock << div) : 0;
Also, clock is not 0..
Best Regards,
Jaehoon Chung
> }
>
> host->current_speed = clock;
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists