linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v8 5/9] ARM: dts: am437x/am33xx/da850: Add new ECAP and EPWM bindings

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20160610130114.GP22406@atomide.com>
Date:	Fri, 10 Jun 2016 06:01:15 -0700
From:	Tony Lindgren <tony@...mide.com>
To:	Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@...il.com>
Cc:	Franklin S Cooper Jr <fcooper@...com>, robh+dt@...nel.org,
	linux@....linux.org.uk, paul@...an.com, t-kristo@...com,
	mturquette@...libre.com, sboyd@...eaurora.org,
	linux-pwm@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-omap@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-clk@...r.kernel.org,
	vigneshr@...com, nsekhar@...com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v8 5/9] ARM: dts: am437x/am33xx/da850: Add new ECAP and
 EPWM bindings

* Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@...il.com> [160610 05:42]:
> On Fri, Jun 10, 2016 at 05:01:43AM -0700, Tony Lindgren wrote:
> > * Tony Lindgren <tony@...mide.com> [160610 03:37]:
> > > * Franklin S Cooper Jr <fcooper@...com> [160503 08:58]:
> > > > Switch to a new ECAP and EPWM bindings that doesn't depend on hwmod to
> > > > provide the various required clocks.
> > > > 
> > > > For AM437 and AM335x, add the required clocks explicitly to DT. The
> > > > hwmod entries for ECAP and EPWM will be removed and this will prevent
> > > > anything from breaking.
> > > 
> > > I've applying the first patch into omap-for-v4.8/soc, the rest into
> > > omap-for-v4.8/dt. Note that this patch did not apply against d850.dtsi
> > > so please resend that change as a separate patch to the davinci
> > > maintainer.
> > 
> > And I did not apply patch "pwms: pwm-ti*: Get the clock from the PWMSS
> > parent when using old bindings", Thierry should take that one.
> 
> Tony, did you take patches 3 and 4 already? It's fine if yo have, just
> wanted to know whether I should pick those up as well.

Yes looks like I also took the binding documentation patches too.

Regards,

Tony