[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <17ac39d6-d451-ed43-1aa6-f2af462a61e0@codethink.co.uk>
Date: Fri, 10 Jun 2016 14:02:33 +0100
From: Ben Dooks <ben.dooks@...ethink.co.uk>
To: Krzysztof Kozlowski <k.kozlowski@...sung.com>,
Matthew Leach <matthew@...tleach.net>
Cc: linux-samsung-soc@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 07/15] ARM: exynos: fixup debug macros for big-endian
On 10/06/16 12:16, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> On 06/10/2016 01:12 PM, Ben Dooks wrote:
>> On 08/06/16 19:31, Matthew Leach wrote:
>>> From: Ben Dooks <ben.dooks@...ethink.co.uk>
>>>
>>> The exynos low-level debug macros need to be fixed if the system is being
>>> built big endian. Add the necessary endian swaps for accessing the registers
>>> to get output working again
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Ben Dooks <ben.dooks@...ethink.co.uk>
>>> ---
>>> arch/arm/include/debug/samsung.S | 8 ++++++++
>>> 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+)
>>
>> Should this go via the maintainer or to RMK?
>>
>> If to RMK, then shall I get it submitted (and does anyone else
>> want to ack?)
>
> If there are no objections, I can take it through samsung-soc with other
> arch/arm/mach-exynos* patches.
>
> What I am missing here, is Matthew's Signed-off-by.
>
> Matthew, you touched and sent the patch so could you add the Sob?
I've asked Matthew to re-send the core patches with the signed-off
sorted out. He can also put them on a public facing git server if
that would be helpful.
--
Ben Dooks http://www.codethink.co.uk/
Senior Engineer Codethink - Providing Genius
Powered by blists - more mailing lists