lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <575D56DF.8080203@huawei.com>
Date:	Sun, 12 Jun 2016 20:34:39 +0800
From:	"Zhangjian (Bamvor)" <bamvor.zhangjian@...wei.com>
To:	Yury Norov <ynorov@...iumnetworks.com>, <arnd@...db.de>,
	<catalin.marinas@....com>, <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
	<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-doc@...r.kernel.org>,
	<linux-arch@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-s390@...r.kernel.org>,
	<libc-alpha@...rceware.org>
CC:	<schwidefsky@...ibm.com>, <heiko.carstens@...ibm.com>,
	<pinskia@...il.com>, <broonie@...nel.org>,
	<joseph@...esourcery.com>,
	<christoph.muellner@...obroma-systems.com>,
	<szabolcs.nagy@....com>, <klimov.linux@...il.com>,
	<Nathan_Lynch@...tor.com>, <agraf@...e.de>,
	<Prasun.Kapoor@...iumnetworks.com>, <kilobyte@...band.pl>,
	<geert@...ux-m68k.org>, <philipp.tomsich@...obroma-systems.com>,
	"Andrew Pinski" <apinski@...ium.com>,
	Andrew Pinski <Andrew.Pinski@...iumnetworks.com>,
	Hanjun Guo <guohanjun@...wei.com>,
	"Zhangjian (Bamvor)" <bamvor.zhangjian@...wei.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 21/23] arm64: ilp32: introduce ilp32-specific handlers for
 sigframe and ucontext

ping

On 2016/6/4 19:34, Zhangjian (Bamvor) wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I found an issue of unwind with the following code. The correct backtrace
> should be:
> (gdb) where
> #0 0x004004d0 in my_sig (sig=11) at test_force3.c:16
> #1 <signal handler called>
> #2 func2 (num=0) at test_force3.c:22
> #3 0x00400540 in func1 (num=1) at test_force3.c:28
> #4 0x00400574 in main (argc=1, argv=0xffd7bc04) at test_force3.c:33
>
> Without my patch, the backtrace is:
> (gdb) where
> #0 0x00400490 in my_sig (sig=11) at test_force3.c:16
> #1 <signal handler called>
> #2 0x004004e4 in main (argc=1, argv=0xffe6f8f4) at test_force3.c:33
>
> With my patch which fix the wrong frame pointer(setup_return calculate the offset
> of fp through ilp32_sigframe instead of sigfreame), the backtrace is:
> (gdb) where
> #0 0x00400490 in my_sig (sig=11) at test_force3.c:16
> #1 <signal handler called>
> #2 func1 () at test_force3.c:28
> #3 0x004004e4 in main (argc=1, argv=0xffe6f8f4) at test_force3.c:33
>
> I am not sure there is still some issue in kernel. But it seem that the gdb of ilp32
> does not work correctly when unwind without framepointer.
>
> The test code is:
>
> #include <stdio.h>
> #include <stdlib.h>
> #include <unistd.h>
> #include <signal.h>
>
> void my_sig(int sig)
> {
>      printf("sig=%d\n", sig);
>      *(int *)0 = 0x0;
> }
>
>
> void func2()
> {
>      *(int *)0 = 0x0;
> }
>
> void func1()
> {
>      func2();
> }
>
> int main(int argc, char **argv)
> {
>      signal(11, my_sig);
>      func1();
>      return 0;
> }
>
>
> The full patch is as follows:
>
>  From 7e364a765097f57aed2d73f94c1688c2e7343e79 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> From: Bamvor Jian Zhang <bamvor.zhangjian@...wei.com>
> Date: Sat, 4 Jun 2016 14:30:05 +0800
> Subject: [PATCH] arm64: ilp32: fix for wrong fp offset when calculate the
>   new fp
>
> ILP32 define its own sigframe(ilp32_sigframe) because of the
> difference uc_context. setup_return do not use ilp32 specific
> sigframe to calculate the new offset of fp which lead to wrong
> fp in signal handler. At this circumstance, gdb backtrace will miss
> one item:
> (gdb) where
>
> It should be:
> (gdb) where
>
> The test code is as follows:
>
> void my_sig(int sig)
> {
>          printf("sig=%d\n", sig);
>          *(int *)0 = 0x0;
> }
>
> void func2(int num)
> {
>          printf("%s: %d\n", __FUNCTION__, num);
>          *(int *)0 = 0x0;
>          func2(num-1);
> }
>
> void func1(int num)
> {
>          printf("%s\n", __FUNCTION__);
>          func2(num - 1);
> }
>
> int main(int argc, char **argv)
> {
>          signal(11, my_sig);
>          func1(argc);
>          return 0;
> }
>
> This patch fix this by passing the correct offset of fp to
> setup_return.
> Test pass on both ILP32 and LP64 in aarch64 EE.
>
> Signed-off-by: Bamvor Jian Zhang <bamvor.zhangjian@...wei.com>
> ---
>   arch/arm64/include/asm/signal_common.h | 3 ++-
>   arch/arm64/kernel/signal.c             | 9 +++++----
>   arch/arm64/kernel/signal_ilp32.c       | 4 ++--
>   3 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/signal_common.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/signal_common.h
> index de93c71..a5d7b63 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/signal_common.h
> +++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/signal_common.h
> @@ -29,6 +29,7 @@ int setup_sigcontex(struct sigcontext __user *uc_mcontext,
>               struct pt_regs *regs);
>   int restore_sigcontext(struct pt_regs *regs, struct sigcontext __user *sf);
>   void setup_return(struct pt_regs *regs, struct k_sigaction *ka,
> -            void __user *frame, off_t sigframe_off, int usig);
> +            void __user *frame, off_t sigframe_off, off_t fp_off,
> +            int usig);
>
>   #endif /* __ASM_SIGNAL_COMMON_H */
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/signal.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/signal.c
> index 038bebe..e66a6e9 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/kernel/signal.c
> +++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/signal.c
> @@ -256,14 +256,14 @@ static struct rt_sigframe __user *get_sigframe(struct ksignal *ksig,
>   }
>
>   void setup_return(struct pt_regs *regs, struct k_sigaction *ka,
> -             void __user *frame, off_t sigframe_off, int usig)
> +             void __user *frame, off_t sigframe_off, off_t fp_off,
> +             int usig)
>   {
>       __sigrestore_t sigtramp;
>
>       regs->regs[0] = usig;
>       regs->sp = (unsigned long)frame;
> -    regs->regs[29] = regs->sp + sigframe_off +
> -        offsetof(struct sigframe, fp);
> +    regs->regs[29] = regs->sp + sigframe_off + fp_off;
>       regs->pc = (unsigned long)ka->sa.sa_handler;
>
>       if (ka->sa.sa_flags & SA_RESTORER)
> @@ -294,7 +294,8 @@ static int setup_rt_frame(int usig, struct ksignal *ksig, sigset_t *set,
>       err |= setup_sigframe(&frame->sig, regs, set);
>       if (err == 0) {
>           setup_return(regs, &ksig->ka, frame,
> -            offsetof(struct rt_sigframe, sig), usig);
> +            offsetof(struct rt_sigframe, sig),
> +            offsetof(struct sigframe, fp), usig);
>           if (ksig->ka.sa.sa_flags & SA_SIGINFO) {
>               err |= copy_siginfo_to_user(&frame->info, &ksig->info);
>               regs->regs[1] = (unsigned long)&frame->info;
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/signal_ilp32.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/signal_ilp32.c
> index a8ea73e..9030f14 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/kernel/signal_ilp32.c
> +++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/signal_ilp32.c
> @@ -147,7 +147,6 @@ static struct ilp32_rt_sigframe __user *ilp32_get_sigframe(struct ksignal *ksig,
>       struct ilp32_rt_sigframe __user *frame;
>
>       sp = sp_top = sigsp(regs->sp, ksig);
> -
>       sp = (sp - sizeof(struct ilp32_rt_sigframe)) & ~15;
>       frame = (struct ilp32_rt_sigframe __user *)sp;
>
> @@ -183,7 +182,8 @@ int ilp32_setup_rt_frame(int usig, struct ksignal *ksig,
>       err |= setup_ilp32_sigframe(&frame->sig, regs, set);
>       if (err == 0) {
>           setup_return(regs, &ksig->ka, frame,
> -                 offsetof(struct ilp32_rt_sigframe, sig), usig);
> +                 offsetof(struct ilp32_rt_sigframe, sig),
> +                 offsetof(struct ilp32_sigframe, fp), usig);
>           regs->regs[1] = (unsigned long)&frame->info;
>           regs->regs[2] = (unsigned long)&frame->sig.uc;
>       }

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ