[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <575D53B0.5020408@huawei.com>
Date: Sun, 12 Jun 2016 20:21:04 +0800
From: "Zhangjian (Bamvor)" <bamvor.zhangjian@...wei.com>
To: Yury Norov <ynorov@...iumnetworks.com>, <arnd@...db.de>,
<catalin.marinas@....com>, <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-doc@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-arch@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-s390@...r.kernel.org>,
<libc-alpha@...rceware.org>
CC: <schwidefsky@...ibm.com>, <heiko.carstens@...ibm.com>,
<pinskia@...il.com>, <broonie@...nel.org>,
<joseph@...esourcery.com>,
<christoph.muellner@...obroma-systems.com>,
<szabolcs.nagy@....com>, <klimov.linux@...il.com>,
<Nathan_Lynch@...tor.com>, <agraf@...e.de>,
<Prasun.Kapoor@...iumnetworks.com>, <kilobyte@...band.pl>,
<geert@...ux-m68k.org>, <philipp.tomsich@...obroma-systems.com>,
"Andrew Pinski" <Andrew.Pinski@...iumnetworks.com>,
Hanjun Guo <guohanjun@...wei.com>,
"Zhangjian (Bamvor)" <bamvor.zhangjian@...wei.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 13/23] arm64: introduce is_a32_task and is_a32_thread (for
AArch32 compat)
Hi, Yury
On 2016/5/24 8:04, Yury Norov wrote:
> Based on patch of Andrew Pinski.
>
> This patch introduces is_a32_compat_task and is_a32_thread so it is
> easier to say this is a a32 specific thread or a generic compat thread/task.
> Corresponding functions are located in <asm/is_compat.h> to avoid mess in
> headers.
>
> Some files include both <linux/compat.h> and <asm/compat.h>,
> and this is wrong because <linux/compat.h> has <asm/compat.h> already
> included. It was fixed too.
>
> Signed-off-by: Yury Norov <ynorov@...iumnetworks.com>
> Signed-off-by: Philipp Tomsich <philipp.tomsich@...obroma-systems.com>
> Signed-off-by: Christoph Muellner <christoph.muellner@...obroma-systems.com>
> Signed-off-by: Andrew Pinski <Andrew.Pinski@...iumnetworks.com>
> Reviewed-by: David Daney <ddaney@...iumnetworks.com>
> ---
> arch/arm64/include/asm/compat.h | 19 ++----------
> arch/arm64/include/asm/elf.h | 10 +++----
> arch/arm64/include/asm/ftrace.h | 2 +-
> arch/arm64/include/asm/is_compat.h | 58 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> arch/arm64/include/asm/memory.h | 3 +-
> arch/arm64/include/asm/processor.h | 5 ++--
> arch/arm64/include/asm/syscall.h | 2 +-
> arch/arm64/include/asm/thread_info.h | 2 +-
> arch/arm64/kernel/hw_breakpoint.c | 10 +++----
> arch/arm64/kernel/perf_regs.c | 2 +-
> arch/arm64/kernel/process.c | 7 ++---
> arch/arm64/kernel/ptrace.c | 11 ++++---
> arch/arm64/kernel/signal.c | 4 +--
> arch/arm64/kernel/traps.c | 3 +-
> 14 files changed, 91 insertions(+), 47 deletions(-)
> create mode 100644 arch/arm64/include/asm/is_compat.h
>
[...]
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/memory.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/memory.h
> index 12f8a00..a66a0f7 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/memory.h
> +++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/memory.h
> @@ -26,6 +26,7 @@
> #include <linux/types.h>
> #include <asm/bug.h>
> #include <asm/sizes.h>
> +#include <asm/is_compat.h>
>
> /*
> * Allow for constants defined here to be used from assembly code
> @@ -61,7 +62,7 @@
>
> #ifdef CONFIG_COMPAT
> #define TASK_SIZE_32 UL(0x100000000)
> -#define TASK_SIZE (test_thread_flag(TIF_32BIT) ? \
> +#define TASK_SIZE (is_compat_task() ? \
> TASK_SIZE_32 : TASK_SIZE_64)
> #define TASK_SIZE_OF(tsk) (test_tsk_thread_flag(tsk, TIF_32BIT) ? \
> TASK_SIZE_32 : TASK_SIZE_64)
Should we update or delete this macro?
#define TASK_SIZE_OF(tsk) (is_compat_task() ? \
TASK_SIZE_32 : TASK_SIZE_64)
x86, sparc, mips, ppc, parisc, s390 define its own version. But
"include/linux/sched.h" will define it if
TASK_SIZE_OF does not exist:
#ifndef TASK_SIZE_OF
#define TASK_SIZE_OF(tsk) TASK_SIZE
#endif
Regards
Bamvor
Powered by blists - more mailing lists