[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20160613084225.GT22406@atomide.com>
Date: Mon, 13 Jun 2016 01:42:26 -0700
From: Tony Lindgren <tony@...mide.com>
To: Nishanth Menon <nm@...com>
Cc: lkml <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
linux-omap <linux-omap@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/3] ARM: OMAP: DRA7: Update to latest TRM and cleanup
* Nishanth Menon <nm@...com> [160610 07:20]:
> On Fri, Jun 10, 2016 at 4:34 AM, Tony Lindgren <tony@...mide.com> wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > * Nishanth Menon <nm@...com> [160524 06:37]:
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >> Here are the final(hopefully) pending patches for DRA7 based on recent
> >> TRM updates. Updates include removing retention support on L3init and
> >> L4per as per latest SoC updates.
> >>
> >> Test Log: X15 (no modules): http://pastebin.ubuntu.com/16655027/
> >>
> >> Latest TRM (rev F): http://www.ti.com/lit/pdf/spruhz6 (public on May 18)
> >>
> >> Nishanth Menon (3):
> >> ARM: OMAP: DRA7: powerdomain data: Set L3init and L4per to ON
> >> ARM: OMAP: DRA7: powerdomain data: Remove unused pwrsts_logic_ret
> >> ARM: OMAP: DRA7: powerdomain data: Remove unused pwrsts_mem_ret
> >>
> >> arch/arm/mach-omap2/powerdomains7xx_data.c | 76 +-----------------------------
> >> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 74 deletions(-)
> >
> > Can these wait until v4.8 merge window, are this needed as fixes to
> > avoid hardware problems?
>
> Yes - at least patch #1 is a h/w "limitation" and can result in non
> functional SoC after a duration of operation. the patches #2/3 are
> code shrinkage to remove unused data.
OK thanks that's a good reason to have them merged for v4.7.
I've applied them into omap-for-v4.7/fixes and will send a pull
request later today.
Regards,
Tony
Powered by blists - more mailing lists