[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <575F025F.7000101@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 13 Jun 2016 21:58:39 +0300
From: Ivaylo Dimitrov <ivo.g.dimitrov.75@...il.com>
To: Tony Lindgren <tony@...mide.com>
Cc: robh+dt@...nel.org, pawel.moll@....com, mark.rutland@....com,
ijc+devicetree@...lion.org.uk, galak@...eaurora.org,
thierry.reding@...il.com, bcousson@...libre.com,
linux@....linux.org.uk, mchehab@....samsung.com,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-pwm@...r.kernel.org, linux-omap@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-media@...r.kernel.org,
sre@...nel.org, pali.rohar@...il.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/7] ARM: OMAP: dmtimer: Do not call PM runtime functions
when not needed.
Hi,
On 13.06.2016 10:10, Tony Lindgren wrote:
> * Ivaylo Dimitrov <ivo.g.dimitrov.75@...il.com> [160610 14:23]:
>>
>> On 10.06.2016 13:22, Tony Lindgren wrote:
>>>
>>> OK. And I just applied the related dts changes. Please repost the driver
>>> changes and DT binding doc with Rob's ack to the driver maintainers to
>>> apply.
>>>
>>
>> Already did, see https://lkml.org/lkml/2016/5/16/429
>>
>> Shall I do anything else?
>
> Probably good idea to repost just the driver changes to the
> subsystem maintainers. With v4.7 out any pre v4.7 patchsets
> easily get forgotten.
>
Sorry for the maybe stupid question, but does this mean that I should
send separate patches instead of series? Or the series without what
you've already applied?
Thanks,
Ivo
Powered by blists - more mailing lists