linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 5/7] ARM: OMAP: dmtimer: Do not call PM runtime functions when not needed.

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20160614075356.GU22406@atomide.com>
Date:	Tue, 14 Jun 2016 00:53:56 -0700
From:	Tony Lindgren <tony@...mide.com>
To:	Ivaylo Dimitrov <ivo.g.dimitrov.75@...il.com>
Cc:	robh+dt@...nel.org, pawel.moll@....com, mark.rutland@....com,
	ijc+devicetree@...lion.org.uk, galak@...eaurora.org,
	thierry.reding@...il.com, bcousson@...libre.com,
	linux@....linux.org.uk, mchehab@....samsung.com,
	devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-pwm@...r.kernel.org, linux-omap@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-media@...r.kernel.org,
	sre@...nel.org, pali.rohar@...il.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/7] ARM: OMAP: dmtimer: Do not call PM runtime functions
 when not needed.

* Ivaylo Dimitrov <ivo.g.dimitrov.75@...il.com> [160613 12:01]:
> Hi,
> 
> On 13.06.2016 10:10, Tony Lindgren wrote:
> > * Ivaylo Dimitrov <ivo.g.dimitrov.75@...il.com> [160610 14:23]:
> > > 
> > > On 10.06.2016 13:22, Tony Lindgren wrote:
> > > > 
> > > > OK. And I just applied the related dts changes. Please repost the driver
> > > > changes and DT binding doc with Rob's ack to the driver maintainers to
> > > > apply.
> > > > 
> > > 
> > > Already did, see https://lkml.org/lkml/2016/5/16/429
> > > 
> > > Shall I do anything else?
> > 
> > Probably good idea to repost just the driver changes to the
> > subsystem maintainers. With v4.7 out any pre v4.7 patchsets
> > easily get forgotten.
> > 
> 
> Sorry for the maybe stupid question, but does this mean that I should send
> separate patches instead of series? Or the series without what you've
> already applied?

Always leave out the patches that have been already applied.
Otherwise people will get confused. Just mention it in the
cover letter saying "patch xyz has been already applied into
foo tree, these patches are safe to apply separately into bar
tree" or something similar :)

Tony