[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <67e97389-c04e-b155-637b-a6bee4e24919@redhat.com>
Date: Tue, 14 Jun 2016 08:46:26 -0600
From: Al Stone <ahs3@...hat.com>
To: Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>, Al Stone <al.stone@...aro.org>
Cc: linux-doc@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org,
catalin.marinas@....com, linaro-acpi@...ts.linaro.org,
patches@...aro.org, linaro-kernel@...ts.linaro.org
Subject: Re: [RESEND PATCH v5 0/1] ARM64: ACPI: Update documentation for
latest specification version
On 06/14/2016 03:24 AM, Will Deacon wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 14, 2016 at 10:13:31AM +0100, Will Deacon wrote:
>> On Mon, Jun 13, 2016 at 03:41:54PM -0600, Al Stone wrote:
>>> This is a resend only: Ping? Last ping was 26 May; there has been zero
>>> response since then. Already have one ACK from Lorenzo; another from an
>>> arm64 maintainer would be really helpful.
>>
>> I thought there were outstanding comments on v4 of this?
>>
>> http://lkml.kernel.org/r/571E699B.9090906@linaro.org
>
> Hmm, that's weird. You sent a v5 on 25 April:
>
> http://archive.arm.linux.org.uk/lurker/message/20160425.212126.fe36116c.en.html
>
> but I can't find that in either my ARM inbox or my gmail inbox that's
> subscribed to the lists. I guess Catalin can pick this up for 4.8.
>
> Will
Huh. I have no idea why that would have happened. I used the same
script to send the emails for all the revisions.
Thanks for checking, Will. If this would get picked up for 4.8, that would be
most excellent.
--
ciao,
al
-----------------------------------
Al Stone
Software Engineer
Red Hat, Inc.
ahs3@...hat.com
-----------------------------------
Powered by blists - more mailing lists