linux-kernel - Re: [RESEND PATCH v5 0/1] ARM64: ACPI: Update documentation for latest specification version

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20160614145039.GE14654@e104818-lin.cambridge.arm.com>
Date:	Tue, 14 Jun 2016 15:50:39 +0100
From:	Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>
To:	Al Stone <ahs3@...hat.com>
Cc:	Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>, Al Stone <al.stone@...aro.org>,
	linaro-kernel@...ts.linaro.org, linaro-acpi@...ts.linaro.org,
	linux-doc@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org, patches@...aro.org,
	linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [RESEND PATCH v5 0/1] ARM64: ACPI: Update documentation for
 latest specification version

On Tue, Jun 14, 2016 at 08:46:26AM -0600, Al Stone wrote:
> On 06/14/2016 03:24 AM, Will Deacon wrote:
> > On Tue, Jun 14, 2016 at 10:13:31AM +0100, Will Deacon wrote:
> >> On Mon, Jun 13, 2016 at 03:41:54PM -0600, Al Stone wrote:
> >>> This is a resend only: Ping?  Last ping was 26 May; there has been zero
> >>> response since then.  Already have one ACK from Lorenzo; another from an
> >>> arm64 maintainer would be really helpful.
> >>
> >> I thought there were outstanding comments on v4 of this?
> >>
> >> http://lkml.kernel.org/r/571E699B.9090906@linaro.org
> > 
> > Hmm, that's weird. You sent a v5 on 25 April:
> > 
> > http://archive.arm.linux.org.uk/lurker/message/20160425.212126.fe36116c.en.html
> > 
> > but I can't find that in either my ARM inbox or my gmail inbox that's
> > subscribed to the lists. I guess Catalin can pick this up for 4.8.
> 
> Huh.  I have no idea why that would have happened.  I used the same
> script to send the emails for all the revisions.
> 
> Thanks for checking, Will.  If this would get picked up for 4.8, that would be
> most excellent.

I'll queue it for 4.8 (should appear in -next towards the end of this
week).

-- 
Catalin