[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20160614132356.1ea2e1a3@lwn.net>
Date: Tue, 14 Jun 2016 13:23:56 -0600
From: Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>
To: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@...ll.ch>
Cc: Dave Airlie <airlied@...il.com>,
Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@...el.com>,
Markus Heiser <markus.heiser@...marit.de>,
Grant Likely <grant.likely@...retlab.ca>,
Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@....samsung.com>,
Keith Packard <keithp@...thp.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, linux-doc@...r.kernel.org,
Hans Verkuil <hverkuil@...all.nl>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 00/38] Documentation/sphinx
On Tue, 14 Jun 2016 10:15:00 +0200
Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@...ll.ch> wrote:
> Hi Jon,
>
> On Fri, Jun 10, 2016 at 10:41 PM, Dave Airlie <airlied@...il.com> wrote:
>
> > It would be best if Jon can give us a known tag that won't get rebased,
> > and will end up in docs-next and drm-next, then we can arranage for docs-next
> > to get merged early and drm-next should be less trouble.
> >
> > I'm happy to merge that stable branch via drm-misc.
>
> Ping for tag/pull request. Note that for gpu.tmpl->rst conversion we
> only need what's currently in docs-next - you can merge Jani's
> follow-up series at leasure later on.
docs-next as a whole won't be rebased. But, in any case, I've added a
sphinx-4.8 tag at the current spot, hope that helps.
I can promise to have my pull request ready at the beginning of the merge
window so there shouldn't be trouble with DRM having to wait on it.
Thanks,
jon
Powered by blists - more mailing lists