[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <000401d1c673$9705bf50$c5113df0$@emc.com>
Date: Tue, 14 Jun 2016 15:33:10 -0400
From: "Allen Hubbe" <Allen.Hubbe@....com>
To: "'Logan Gunthorpe'" <logang@...tatee.com>,
"'Jon Mason'" <jdmason@...zu.us>,
"'Dave Jiang'" <dave.jiang@...el.com>
Cc: "'Shuah Khan'" <shuahkh@....samsung.com>,
"'Sudip Mukherjee'" <sudipm.mukherjee@...il.com>,
"'Arnd Bergmann'" <arnd@...db.de>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-ntb@...glegroups.com>, <linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: RE: [PATCH v2 6/8] ntb_tool: Add link status and files to debugfs
From: Logan Gunthorpe
> In order to more successfully script with ntb_tool it's useful to
> have a link file to check the link status so that the script
> doesn't use the other files until the link is up.
>
> This commit adds a 'link' file to the debugfs directory which reads a
> boolean (Y or N) depending on the link status. Writing to the file will
> change the link state using ntb_link_enable or ntb_link_disable.
>
> A 'link_event' file is also provided so an application can block until
> the link changes to a desired state. This file is primed by writing a
> boolean. If the user writes a 1, the next read of link_event will
> block until the link is up. If the user writes a 0, the next read
> will block until the link is down. Besides blocking, reads return the
> same value as the 'link' file.
>
> Signed-off-by: Logan Gunthorpe <logang@...tatee.com>
> ---
> drivers/ntb/test/ntb_tool.c | 111 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
> 1 file changed, 110 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/ntb/test/ntb_tool.c b/drivers/ntb/test/ntb_tool.c
> index cba31fd..9bebd0d 100644
> --- a/drivers/ntb/test/ntb_tool.c
> +++ b/drivers/ntb/test/ntb_tool.c
> @@ -59,6 +59,13 @@
> *
> * Eg: check if clearing the doorbell mask generates an interrupt.
> *
> + * # Check the link status
> + * root@...f# cat $DBG_DIR/link
> + *
> + * # Block until the link is up
> + * root@...f# echo Y > $DBG_DIR/link_event
> + * root@...f# cat $DBG_DIR/link_event
> + *
> * # Set the doorbell mask
> * root@...f# echo 's 1' > $DBG_DIR/mask
> *
> @@ -126,7 +133,9 @@ struct tool_ctx {
> struct dentry *dbgfs;
> struct work_struct link_cleanup;
> bool link_is_up;
Really, link_is_up means "memory windows are configured." This comes from your earlier patch that introduced memory windows to ntb_tool.
> + bool link_event;
> struct delayed_work link_work;
> + wait_queue_head_t link_wq;
> int mw_count;
> struct tool_mw mws[MAX_MWS];
> };
> @@ -237,6 +246,7 @@ static void tool_link_work(struct work_struct *work)
> "Error setting up memory windows: %d\n", rc);
>
> tc->link_is_up = true;
In other words, "memory windows are configured" = true.
> + wake_up(&tc->link_wq);
> }
>
> static void tool_link_cleanup(struct work_struct *work)
> @@ -246,6 +256,9 @@ static void tool_link_cleanup(struct work_struct *work)
>
> if (!tc->link_is_up)
> cancel_delayed_work_sync(&tc->link_work);
> +
> + tc->link_is_up = false;
If this was never set false anywhere in the patch that added memory windows, I wonder if there is a bug.
> + wake_up(&tc->link_wq);
> }
>
> static void tool_link_event(void *ctx)
> @@ -578,6 +591,95 @@ static TOOL_FOPS_RDWR(tool_peer_spad_fops,
> tool_peer_spad_read,
> tool_peer_spad_write);
>
> +static ssize_t tool_link_read(struct file *filep, char __user *ubuf,
> + size_t size, loff_t *offp)
> +{
> + struct tool_ctx *tc = filep->private_data;
> + char buf[3];
> +
> + buf[0] = tc->link_is_up ? 'Y' : 'N';
I think tc->link_is_up should instead be ntb_link_is_up(tc->ntb).
> + buf[1] = '\n';
> + buf[2] = '\0';
> +
> + return simple_read_from_buffer(ubuf, size, offp, buf, 2);
> +}
> +
> +static ssize_t tool_link_write(struct file *filep, const char __user *ubuf,
> + size_t size, loff_t *offp)
> +{
> + struct tool_ctx *tc = filep->private_data;
> + char buf[32];
> + size_t buf_size;
> + bool val;
> + int rc;
> +
> + buf_size = min(size, (sizeof(buf) - 1));
> + if (copy_from_user(buf, ubuf, buf_size))
> + return -EFAULT;
> +
> + buf[buf_size] = '\0';
> +
> + rc = strtobool(buf, &val);
> + if (rc)
> + return rc;
> +
> + if (val)
> + ntb_link_enable(tc->ntb, NTB_SPEED_AUTO, NTB_WIDTH_AUTO);
> + else
> + ntb_link_disable(tc->ntb);
> +
> + return size;
> +}
> +
> +static TOOL_FOPS_RDWR(tool_link_fops,
> + tool_link_read,
> + tool_link_write);
> +
> +static ssize_t tool_link_event_read(struct file *filep, char __user *ubuf,
> + size_t size, loff_t *offp)
> +{
> + struct tool_ctx *tc = filep->private_data;
> + char buf[3];
> +
> + if (wait_event_interruptible(tc->link_wq,
> + tc->link_is_up == tc->link_event))
I think tc->link_is_up should instead be ntb_link_is_up(tc->ntb).
> + return -ERESTART;
> +
> + buf[0] = tc->link_is_up ? 'Y' : 'N';
> + buf[1] = '\n';
> + buf[2] = '\0';
> +
> + return simple_read_from_buffer(ubuf, size, offp, buf, 2);
> +}
> +
> +static ssize_t tool_link_event_write(struct file *filep,
> + const char __user *ubuf,
> + size_t size, loff_t *offp)
> +{
> + struct tool_ctx *tc = filep->private_data;
> + char buf[32];
> + size_t buf_size;
> + bool val;
> + int rc;
> +
> + buf_size = min(size, (sizeof(buf) - 1));
> + if (copy_from_user(buf, ubuf, buf_size))
> + return -EFAULT;
> +
> + buf[buf_size] = '\0';
> +
> + rc = strtobool(buf, &val);
> + if (rc)
> + return rc;
> +
> + tc->link_event = val;
All writing the event file does is set the value of tc->link_event, so we have the same value that was set when reading the file. It's rather inefficient, and oops, what if some other script comes along and writes a different value? If script-A wants to wait for link up, and the link is already up, really it should not wait. But if script-B changes tc->link_event to wait for link down before script-A reads the file, then script-A will incorrectly wait.
Really, I think the best thing after all would be just to wait here in the write function.
> +
> + return size;
> +}
> +
> +static TOOL_FOPS_RDWR(tool_link_event_fops,
> + tool_link_event_read,
> + tool_link_event_write);
>
> static ssize_t tool_mw_read(struct file *filep, char __user *ubuf,
> size_t size, loff_t *offp)
> @@ -658,7 +760,6 @@ static TOOL_FOPS_RDWR(tool_mw_fops,
> tool_mw_read,
> tool_mw_write);
>
> -
> static ssize_t tool_peer_mw_read(struct file *filep, char __user *ubuf,
> size_t size, loff_t *offp)
> {
> @@ -713,6 +814,12 @@ static void tool_setup_dbgfs(struct tool_ctx *tc)
> debugfs_create_file("peer_spad", S_IRUSR | S_IWUSR, tc->dbgfs,
> tc, &tool_peer_spad_fops);
>
> + debugfs_create_file("link", S_IRUSR | S_IWUSR, tc->dbgfs,
> + tc, &tool_link_fops);
> +
> + debugfs_create_file("link_event", S_IRUSR | S_IWUSR, tc->dbgfs,
> + tc, &tool_link_event_fops);
> +
> mw_count = min(ntb_mw_count(tc->ntb), MAX_MWS);
> for (i = 0; i < mw_count; i++) {
> char buf[30];
> @@ -746,8 +853,10 @@ static int tool_probe(struct ntb_client *self, struct ntb_dev *ntb)
> }
>
> tc->ntb = ntb;
> + init_waitqueue_head(&tc->link_wq);
> INIT_DELAYED_WORK(&tc->link_work, tool_link_work);
> INIT_WORK(&tc->link_cleanup, tool_link_cleanup);
> + tc->link_event = true;
>
> tool_setup_dbgfs(tc);
>
> --
> 2.1.4
Powered by blists - more mailing lists