[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CACRpkdZEMJoRKa3SSGOhkvZFjq8Y=v_vv8M7mfEkL1PRRB46-A@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 14 Jun 2016 21:38:01 +0200
From: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
To: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...eaurora.org>
Cc: Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@...aro.org>,
stable <stable@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mfd: qcom_rpm: fix offset error for msm8660
On Tue, Jun 14, 2016 at 8:51 PM, Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...eaurora.org> wrote:
> On 06/14, Linus Walleij wrote:
>> -#define RPM_REQUEST_CONTEXT 3
>> -#define RPM_REQ_SELECT 11
>> -#define RPM_ACK_CONTEXT 15
>> -#define RPM_ACK_SELECTOR 23
>> #define RPM_SELECT_SIZE 7
>
> The RPM_SELECT_SIZE is 7 on 8660, but now you've pointed out that
> otherwise the size is 4. I think you've uncovered another bug.
OMG you're right. I'll send a v2 fixing that too.
>> - RPM_CTRL_REG(rpm, RPM_REQ_SELECT + i));
>> + RPM_CTRL_REG(rpm, rpm->data->req_sel_off + i));
>
> Here we write from 0 to ARRAY_SIZE(sel_mask) which is 7. That
> would mean we write into the ack context that starts at 15 (we
> start writing at req_sel_off which is always 11). Oops.
Argh well it seems it didn't hurt so far but let's have it fixed.
Yours,
Linus Walleij
Powered by blists - more mailing lists