[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20160615233028.GK17127@bbox>
Date: Thu, 16 Jun 2016 08:30:28 +0900
From: Minchan Kim <minchan@...nel.org>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
CC: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>, Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@...e.cz>,
Michal Hocko <mhocko@...e.com>,
Hillf Danton <hillf.zj@...baba-inc.com>,
Mel Gorman <mgorman@...hsingularity.net>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mm: compaction: fix dummy declarations
Hi Andrew,
On Wed, Jun 15, 2016 at 02:48:25PM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Wed, 15 Jun 2016 23:39:12 +0200 Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de> wrote:
>
> > We get a build error in several test builds after a recent code rework:
> >
> > In file included from include/linux/balloon_compaction.h:48:0,
> > from mm/balloon_compaction.c:11:
> > include/linux/compaction.h:237:122: error: 'struct node' declared inside parameter list will not be visible outside of this definition or declaration [-Werror]
> >
> > The patch that likely introduced the problem added a forward declaration
> > for 'struct node' in linux/compaction.h, but only in one of two instances.
> >
> > This moves the declaration out of the #ifdef so we always get it.
>
> http://ozlabs.org/~akpm/mmots/broken-out/mm-balloon-use-general-non-lru-movable-page-feature-fix.patch
> should fix this. I guess I should do another -mm.
>
[1] solves the issues so we can revert your patch with removing remaining
forward declaration in below code snippet.
If I should resend patch with removing remainiang forward declaration part,
please tell me.
Thanks.
compaction.h:
#if defined(CONFIG_COMPACTION) && defined(CONFIG_SYSFS) && defined(CONFIG_NUMA)
struct node; <----- Here
extern int compaction_register_node(struct node *node);
...
#else
...
#endif /* CONFIG_COMPACTION && CONFIG_SYSFS && CONFIG_NUMA */
[1] http://ozlabs.org/~akpm/mmots/broken-out/mm-fix-build-warnings-in-linux-compactionh.patch
Thanks.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists