[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CACRpkdb3iiUBTq-BmrsFxWJH4MrUaOTG9WfsCHYUxSYUtZFxvQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 16 Jun 2016 09:20:15 +0200
From: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
To: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...eaurora.org>
Cc: Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@...aro.org>,
stable <stable@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] mfd: qcom_rpm: fix offset error for msm8660
On Thu, Jun 16, 2016 at 2:20 AM, Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...eaurora.org> wrote:
> On 06/15, Linus Walleij wrote:
>> @@ -426,10 +447,11 @@ static irqreturn_t qcom_rpm_ack_interrupt(int irq, void *dev)
>> u32 ack;
>> int i;
>>
>> - ack = readl_relaxed(RPM_CTRL_REG(rpm, RPM_ACK_CONTEXT));
>> - for (i = 0; i < RPM_SELECT_SIZE; i++)
>> - writel_relaxed(0, RPM_CTRL_REG(rpm, RPM_ACK_SELECTOR + i));
>> - writel(0, RPM_CTRL_REG(rpm, RPM_ACK_CONTEXT));
>> + ack = readl_relaxed(RPM_CTRL_REG(rpm, rpm->data->ack_ctx_off));
>> + for (i = 0; i < rpm->data->sel_size; i++)
>> + writel_relaxed(0,
>> + RPM_CTRL_REG(rpm, rpm->data->ack_sel_off + i));
>> + writel(0, RPM_CTRL_REG(rpm, rpm->data->ack_ctx_off));
>
> Does the ack size vary though? I thought that was always 7. It
> seems that really only the request selector size varies?
Ah you're right, I'll send a patch on top of this one fixing it up.
Yours,
Linus Walleij
Powered by blists - more mailing lists