linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 1/1] iio: fix config watermark initial value

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <825785FF-441B-45D3-A4E5-469F85ABBB19@jic23.retrosnub.co.uk>
Date:	Thu, 16 Jun 2016 17:16:17 +0100
From:	Jonathan Cameron <jic23@...23.retrosnub.co.uk>
To:	Daniel Baluta <daniel.baluta@...il.com>,
	Jonathan Cameron <jic23@...nel.org>, laurentiu.palcu@...el.com
CC:	Lars-Peter Clausen <lars@...afoo.de>,
	Irina Tirdea <irina.tirdea@...el.com>,
	"linux-iio@...r.kernel.org" <linux-iio@...r.kernel.org>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Hartmut Knaack <knaack.h@....de>,
	Peter Meerwald <pmeerw@...erw.net>,
	Octavian Purdila <octavian.purdila@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] iio: fix config watermark initial value



On 16 June 2016 12:56:11 BST, Daniel Baluta <daniel.baluta@...il.com> wrote:
>On Mon, Mar 28, 2016 at 1:02 PM, Jonathan Cameron <jic23@...nel.org>
>wrote:
>> On 24/03/16 09:23, Lars-Peter Clausen wrote:
>>> On 03/24/2016 10:09 AM, Irina Tirdea wrote:
>>>> config structure is set to 0 when updating the buffers, so by
>>>> default config->watermark will be 0. When computing the minimum
>>>> between config->watermark and the buffer->watermark or
>>>> insert_buffer-watermark, this will always be 0 regardless of the
>>>> value set by the user for the buffer.
>>>>
>>>> Set as initial value for config->watermark the maximum allowed
>>>> value so that the minimum value will always be set from one of the
>>>> buffers.
>>>>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Irina Tirdea <irina.tirdea@...el.com>
>>>
>>> Looks good. This bug was my fault, sorry.
>>>
>>> Fixes: f0566c0c405d ("iio: Set device watermark based on watermark
>of all
>>> attached buffers")
>> Applied to the fixes-togreg-post-rc1 branch of iio.git and marked for
>stable.
>>
>> Thanks,
>>
>> Jonathan
>>>
>>>> ---
>>>>  drivers/iio/industrialio-buffer.c | 1 +
>>>>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
>>>>
>>>> diff --git a/drivers/iio/industrialio-buffer.c
>b/drivers/iio/industrialio-buffer.c
>>>> index b976332..90462fc 100644
>>>> --- a/drivers/iio/industrialio-buffer.c
>>>> +++ b/drivers/iio/industrialio-buffer.c
>>>> @@ -653,6 +653,7 @@ static int iio_verify_update(struct iio_dev
>*indio_dev,
>>>>      unsigned int modes;
>>>>
>>>>      memset(config, 0, sizeof(*config));
>>>> +    config->watermark = ~0;
>>>>
>>>>      /*
>>>>       * If there is just one buffer and we are removing it there is
>nothing
>>>>
>>>
>>
>> --
>
>
>Hi Jonathan,
>
>After a discussion with Laurentiu (Cc'ed), we noticed that this patch
>is not in the latest IIO (testing, togreg) tree.
>
>What is the path of an IIO fixes patch?
>
>thanks,
>Daniel.
Should be fixes-togreg then staging-linus then mainline.

I probably messed up. Will check.

Jonathan

-- 
Sent from my Android device with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity.