lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Thu, 16 Jun 2016 21:47:39 +0530 From: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org> To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net> Cc: linaro-kernel@...ts.linaro.org, linux-pm@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, steve.muckle@...aro.org Subject: Re: [PATCH V4 0/2] cpufreq: Sort policy->freq_table On 08-06-16, 02:19, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > On Tuesday, June 07, 2016 03:55:13 PM Viresh Kumar wrote: > > Hi Rafael, > > > > I have spent some more time on this stuff and finally came out with a > > very simple solution. I hope you will like it more than the previous > > versions. > > > > Instead of trying to sort the freq-table passed by the drivers, which > > was complicated and would have broken some drivers for sure, this patch > > just checks if the freq-table is sorted or not. > > > > If it is sorted, then we just use a different set of helpers for it. The > > table can be sorted in both ascending and descending orders now and > > helpers are present for both the cases. > > Well, that's something I was thinking about from the start. :-) > > > All the patches are pushed here for testing in case anyone wants to try: > > git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/vireshk/pm.git cpufreq/sorted-freq-table > > > > V3->V4: > > - Written from scratch really, completely different approach. > > I'll look at the code later this week. Hi Rafael, Did you get a chance to look at these? Steve may be blocked on this :) -- viresh
Powered by blists - more mailing lists