[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAMJBoFPcaAbsQ=PA2WPsmuyd1a-SyJgE5k4Rn2CUf6rS0-ykKw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 17 Jun 2016 10:30:58 +0200
From: Vitaly Wool <vitalywool@...il.com>
To: Minchan Kim <minchan@...nel.org>
Cc: Geliang Tang <geliangtang@...il.com>,
Nitin Gupta <ngupta@...are.org>,
Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky.work@...il.com>,
Dan Streetman <ddstreet@...e.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux-MM <linux-mm@...ck.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] zram: update zram to use zpool
Hi Minchan,
On Thu, Jun 16, 2016 at 1:17 AM, Minchan Kim <minchan@...nel.org> wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 15, 2016 at 10:42:07PM +0800, Geliang Tang wrote:
>> Change zram to use the zpool api instead of directly using zsmalloc.
>> The zpool api doesn't have zs_compact() and zs_pool_stats() functions.
>> I did the following two things to fix it.
>> 1) I replace zs_compact() with zpool_shrink(), use zpool_shrink() to
>> call zs_compact() in zsmalloc.
>> 2) The 'pages_compacted' attribute is showed in zram by calling
>> zs_pool_stats(). So in order not to call zs_pool_state() I move the
>> attribute to zsmalloc.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Geliang Tang <geliangtang@...il.com>
>
> NACK.
>
> I already explained why.
> http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20160609013411.GA29779@bbox
This is a fair statement, to a certain extent. I'll let Geliang speak
for himself but I am personally interested in this zram extension
because I want it to work on MMU-less systems. zsmalloc can not handle
that, so I want to be able to use zram over z3fold.
Best regards,
Vitaly
Powered by blists - more mailing lists