[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CA+Ln22HHNnPuEq1WVs+iiEEbAhdvkADhVkj99pqgR0qJODFUXw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 19 Jun 2016 22:44:20 +0900
From: Tomasz Figa <tomasz.figa@...il.com>
To: Andi Shyti <andi@...zian.org>
Cc: Andi Shyti <andi.shyti@...sung.com>,
Chanwoo Choi <cw00.choi@...sung.com>,
Sylwester Nawrocki <s.nawrocki@...sung.com>,
Michael Turquette <mturquette@...libre.com>,
Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...eaurora.org>,
Kukjin Kim <kgene@...nel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <k.kozlowski@...sung.com>,
"linux-samsung-soc@...r.kernel.org"
<linux-samsung-soc@...r.kernel.org>, linux-clk@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Jaehoon Chung <jh80.chung@...sung.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] clk: samsung: exynos5433: use clock_ignore_unused flag
for SPI3 related clocks
2016-06-19 14:59 GMT+09:00 Andi Shyti <andi@...zian.org>:
> Hi Tomasz,
>
>> > The SPI 3 bus uses two clocks, a bus clock and an input clock.
>> > Do not disable the clocks when unused in order to allow access to
>> > the SPI 3 device.
>>
>> If unused, why would access to SPI 3 device needed?
>
> because next I will submit a small driver which uses the SPI3.
> Actually in the exynos5433 boards all the SPI are used but not all
> the drivers are ported to mainline.
Then shouldn't the driver request the clocks and enable them? Or I'm
missing something obvious? :)
Best regards,
Tomasz
Powered by blists - more mailing lists