[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1466424475.6070.43.camel@pengutronix.de>
Date: Mon, 20 Jun 2016 14:07:55 +0200
From: Philipp Zabel <p.zabel@...gutronix.de>
To: Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>
Cc: linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
kernel@...inux.com, maxime.coquelin@...com,
srinivas.kandagatla@...il.com, kishon@...com, balbi@...nel.org,
gregkh@...uxfoundation.org, linux-usb@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/7] reset: Reorder inline reset_control_get*() wrappers
Am Montag, den 06.06.2016, 16:56 +0100 schrieb Lee Jones:
> We're about to split the current API into two, where consumers will
> be forced to be explicit when requesting reset lines. The choice
> will be to either the call the *_exclusive or *_shared variant
> depending on whether they can actually tolorate not being asserted
> when that request is made.
>
> The new API will look like this once reorded and complete:
>
> reset_control_get_exclusive()
> reset_control_get_shared()
> reset_control_get_optional_exclusive()
> reset_control_get_optional_shared()
> of_reset_control_get_exclusive()
> of_reset_control_get_shared()
> of_reset_control_get_exclusive_by_index()
> of_reset_control_get_shared_by_index()
> devm_reset_control_get_exclusive()
> devm_reset_control_get_shared()
> devm_reset_control_get_optional_exclusive()
> devm_reset_control_get_optional_shared()
> devm_reset_control_get_exclusive_by_index()
> devm_reset_control_get_shared_by_index()
>
> Signed-off-by: Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>
I have applied patches 1-5 to my reset/next branch.
regards
Philipp
Powered by blists - more mailing lists