[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <5768051E.3020008@codeaurora.org>
Date: Mon, 20 Jun 2016 10:00:46 -0500
From: Timur Tabi <timur@...eaurora.org>
To: Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@...ux.intel.com>,
Wolfram Sang <wsa@...-dreams.de>
Cc: Austin Christ <austinwc@...eaurora.org>, linux-i2c@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org,
rruigrok@...eaurora.org, cov@...eaurora.org, nkaje@...eaurora.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 1/2] i2c: qup: add ACPI support
Mika Westerberg wrote:
> Use has_acpi_companion() if you need to.
Is has_acpi_companion() the preferred alternative to ACPI_HANDLE()? We
frequently need to write code that does something different on ACPI vs
DT, and there doesn't appear to be much consistency on how that's handled.
--
Sent by an employee of the Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc.
The Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of the
Code Aurora Forum, hosted by The Linux Foundation.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists