linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v4 1/2] i2c: qup: add ACPI support

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20160620150722.GP1739@lahna.fi.intel.com>
Date:	Mon, 20 Jun 2016 18:07:22 +0300
From:	Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@...ux.intel.com>
To:	Timur Tabi <timur@...eaurora.org>
Cc:	Wolfram Sang <wsa@...-dreams.de>,
	Austin Christ <austinwc@...eaurora.org>,
	linux-i2c@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org, rruigrok@...eaurora.org,
	cov@...eaurora.org, nkaje@...eaurora.org,
	linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 1/2] i2c: qup: add ACPI support

On Mon, Jun 20, 2016 at 10:00:46AM -0500, Timur Tabi wrote:
> Mika Westerberg wrote:
> > Use has_acpi_companion() if you need to.
> 
> Is has_acpi_companion() the preferred alternative to ACPI_HANDLE()?  We
> frequently need to write code that does something different on ACPI vs DT,
> and there doesn't appear to be much consistency on how that's handled.

Yes, that's the preferred one.