[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1466540836-26639-1-git-send-email-kyle.roeschley@ni.com>
Date: Tue, 21 Jun 2016 15:27:16 -0500
From: Kyle Roeschley <kyle.roeschley@...com>
To: boris.brezillon@...e-electrons.com, richard@....at
Cc: dwmw2@...radead.org, computersforpeace@...il.com,
beanhuo@...ron.com, linux-mtd@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, nathan.sullivan@...com,
xander.huff@...com, peterpansjtu@...il.com
Subject: [PATCH v5] mtd: nand_bbt: scan for next free bbt block if writing bbt fails
If erasing or writing the BBT fails, we should mark the current BBT
block as bad and use the BBT descriptor to scan for the next available
unused block in the BBT. We should only return a failure if there isn't
any space left.
Based on original code implemented by Jeff Westfahl
<jeff.westfahl@...com>.
Signed-off-by: Kyle Roeschley <kyle.roeschley@...com>
Suggested-by: Jeff Westfahl <jeff.westfahl@...com>
---
v5: De-duplicate bad block handling
v4: Don't ignore write protection while marking bad BBT blocks
Correctly call block_markbad
Minor cleanups
v3: Don't overload mtd->priv
Keep nand_erase_nand from erroring on protected BBT blocks
v2: Mark OOB area in each block as well as BBT
Avoid marking read-only, bad address, or known bad blocks as bad
drivers/mtd/nand/nand_bbt.c | 41 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--
1 file changed, 39 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
drivers/mtd/nand/nand_bbt.c | 40 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------
1 file changed, 34 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/mtd/nand/nand_bbt.c b/drivers/mtd/nand/nand_bbt.c
index 2fbb523..c9255f8 100644
--- a/drivers/mtd/nand/nand_bbt.c
+++ b/drivers/mtd/nand/nand_bbt.c
@@ -620,7 +620,7 @@ static int write_bbt(struct mtd_info *mtd, uint8_t *buf,
{
struct nand_chip *this = mtd_to_nand(mtd);
struct erase_info einfo;
- int i, res, chip = 0;
+ int i, res, chip = 0, found_bad_block = 0;
int bits, startblock, dir, page, offs, numblocks, sft, sftmsk;
int nrchips, pageoffs, ooboffs;
uint8_t msk[4];
@@ -663,6 +663,27 @@ static int write_bbt(struct mtd_info *mtd, uint8_t *buf,
goto write;
}
+next:
+ if (found_bad_block) {
+ /*
+ * We found a bad block on the last loop iteration.
+ * Mark it as such and see if there's another block
+ * available in the BBT area.
+ */
+ int block = page >>
+ (this->bbt_erase_shift - this->page_shift);
+ pr_info("nand_bbt: failed to erase block %d when writing BBT\n",
+ block);
+ bbt_mark_entry(this, block, BBT_BLOCK_WORN);
+
+ res = this->block_markbad(mtd, to);
+ if (res)
+ pr_warn("nand_bbt: error %d while marking block %d bad\n",
+ res, block);
+ td->pages[chip] = -1;
+ found_bad_block = 0;
+ }
+
/*
* Automatic placement of the bad block table. Search direction
* top -> down?
@@ -787,14 +808,21 @@ static int write_bbt(struct mtd_info *mtd, uint8_t *buf,
einfo.addr = to;
einfo.len = 1 << this->bbt_erase_shift;
res = nand_erase_nand(mtd, &einfo, 1);
- if (res < 0)
+ if (res == -EIO) {
+ found_bad_block = 1;
+ goto next;
+ } else if (res) {
goto outerr;
+ }
- res = scan_write_bbt(mtd, to, len, buf,
- td->options & NAND_BBT_NO_OOB ? NULL :
- &buf[len]);
- if (res < 0)
+ res = scan_write_bbt(mtd, to, len, buf, td->options &
+ NAND_BBT_NO_OOB ? NULL : &buf[len]);
+ if (res == -EIO) {
+ found_bad_block = 1;
+ goto next;
+ } else if (res) {
goto outerr;
+ }
pr_info("Bad block table written to 0x%012llx, version 0x%02X\n",
(unsigned long long)to, td->version[chip]);
--
2.8.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists