[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20160621080951.GN30909@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net>
Date: Tue, 21 Jun 2016 10:09:51 +0200
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...hat.com>
Cc: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...nel.org>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
lkml <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
James Hartsock <hartsjc@...hat.com>,
Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com>,
Srivatsa Vaddagiri <vatsa@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Kirill Tkhai <ktkhai@...allels.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/4] sched/fair: Introduce sched_entity::dont_balance
On Mon, Jun 20, 2016 at 05:59:29PM +0200, Jiri Olsa wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 20, 2016 at 04:28:23PM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> > Never use bool in structures.
>
> ok, but I couldn't find anything real sinister about that..
> so why is that? ;-)
C does not define sizeof(bool) :-)
Obviously any implementation must, but you then get implementation
defined layout differences in your structures, which is crap.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists