[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20160621081202.GO30909@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net>
Date: Tue, 21 Jun 2016 10:12:02 +0200
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...hat.com>
Cc: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...nel.org>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
lkml <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
James Hartsock <hartsjc@...hat.com>,
Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com>,
Srivatsa Vaddagiri <vatsa@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Kirill Tkhai <ktkhai@...allels.com>,
Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/4] sched/fair: Introduce idle enter/exit balance
callbacks
On Mon, Jun 20, 2016 at 06:27:41PM +0200, Jiri Olsa wrote:
> so it might not be that easy to switch it to use the easy
> change I added as part of this RFC, but AFAIU it should be
> the same idle mask, but this approach might be too naive
> and miss some idle enter/exit paths.. CC-ing Frederic
Right, for RFC this will do; but I really want to avoid adding another
global atomic bitmask on the idle path.
In any case, I'll go look over the actual patches sometime soon, I still
got a few other patches series to stare at first.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists