linux-kernel - Re: [RFC][PATCH] arm: ubsan: select ARCH_HAS_UBSAN_SANITIZE

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <12441230.VuJWJP4oWR@wuerfel>
Date:	Tue, 21 Jun 2016 10:43:19 +0200
From:	Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
To:	linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
Cc:	Seung-Woo Kim <sw0312.kim@...sung.com>, linux@...linux.org.uk,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, aryabinin@...tuozzo.com
Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH] arm: ubsan: select ARCH_HAS_UBSAN_SANITIZE_ALL

On Tuesday, June 21, 2016 2:39:05 PM CEST Seung-Woo Kim wrote:
> To enable UBSAN on arm, this patch enables ARCH_HAS_UBSAN_SANITIZE_ALL
> from arm confiuration. Basic kernel booting is tested on arm kernel
> enabled CONFIG_UBSAN_SANITIZE_ALL from Exynos5422 based Odroid-XU3
> board.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Seung-Woo Kim <sw0312.kim@...sung.com>
> ---
> Because I tested only with specific soc board, so I am not sure the ubsan is
> fine for all other cases. So, I send this patch as a RFC.
> 

I've tried this out on my build test box in the past, but ran into
some problems. In particular I ended up disabling 
-fsanitize=signed-integer-overflow and -fsanitize=object-size
and later reverting the whole thing, but don't remember exactly
why (possibly I was hitting internal compiler errors?).'

Let me re-enable it with your patch locally and report back
with whatever build problems I run into.

	Arnd