linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v9 2/4] power: reset: add reboot mode driver

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-id: <576909C3.4010109@samsung.com>
Date:	Tue, 21 Jun 2016 11:32:51 +0200
From:	Krzysztof Kozlowski <k.kozlowski@...sung.com>
To:	Andy Yan <andy.yan@...k-chips.com>,
	Paul Gortmaker <paul.gortmaker@...driver.com>
Cc:	robh+dt@...nel.org, heiko@...ech.de, john.stultz@...aro.org,
	arnd@...db.de, bjorn.andersson@...aro.org,
	devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	alexandre.belloni@...e-electrons.com, dbaryshkov@...il.com,
	sre@...nel.org, matthias.bgg@...il.com, linux-pm@...r.kernel.org,
	mbrugger@...e.com, lorenzo.pieralisi@....com,
	moritz.fischer@...us.com, richard@....at
Subject: Re: [PATCH v9 2/4] power: reset: add reboot mode driver

On 06/21/2016 08:16 AM, Andy Yan wrote:
>   I will remove the module related stuff in the next version.
>>> Following his rationale, I think either this should be a tristate or the
>>> module stuff should be removed.

How about making it tristate? I think there isn't any obstacles for this
driver being a module. Some distros like modules.

Best regards.
Krzysztof