linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v4 0/8] iommu/rockchip: Fix bugs and enable on ARM64

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Tue, 21 Jun 2016 15:52:02 +0200
From:	Joerg Roedel <joro@...tes.org>
To:	Heiko Stübner <heiko@...ech.de>
Cc:	Tomasz Figa <tfiga@...omium.org>,
	"open list:IOMMU DRIVERS" <iommu@...ts.linux-foundation.org>,
	dri-devel <dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org>,
	"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org" 
	<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
	"open list:ARM/Rockchip SoC..." <linux-rockchip@...ts.infradead.org>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	David Airlie <airlied@...ux.ie>,
	Mark Yao <mark.yao@...k-chips.com>,
	Shunqian Zheng <zhengsq@...k-chips.com>,
	Daniel Kurtz <djkurtz@...omium.org>,
	Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@...sung.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 0/8] iommu/rockchip: Fix bugs and enable on ARM64

On Tue, Jun 21, 2016 at 03:18:49PM +0200, Heiko Stübner wrote:
> Am Dienstag, 21. Juni 2016, 14:54:35 schrieb Joerg Roedel:
> > Hi Tomasz,
> > 
> > On Tue, Jun 21, 2016 at 09:42:16PM +0900, Tomasz Figa wrote:
> > > In simple words, DRM patches depend on IOMMU patches.
> > > 
> > > More precisely: The IOMMU patches alone are supposed to not break
> > > anything. Same goes for the first DRM patch (7/8). Only second DRM
> > > patch (8/8) depends on changes introduced by its predecessors.
> > 
> > The first DRM patch is 6/7, so it is 7/8 with the iommu dependency,
> > right? Anyway, I think the best is I take the iommu patches when Heiko
> > is ok with them and then the DRM tree can merge that branch in to apply
> > the DRM patches.
> > 
> > But first Heiko should have a look at the patches.
> 
> I think from all his previous work on the rockchip iommus Tomasz is a lot more 
> qualified to judge them - which I guess he did when picking up the ones from 
> Rockchip devs :-) .

In that case you guys should probably co-maintain that driver?
> 
> >From a style-side, please don't carry the Reviewed-on gerrit tags over to 
> mainline patches (patches 1 and 2).

Okay.



	Joerg