[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1466584741.8787.22.camel@mtksdaap41>
Date: Wed, 22 Jun 2016 16:39:01 +0800
From: Honghui Zhang <honghui.zhang@...iatek.com>
To: Joerg Roedel <joro@...tes.org>
CC: Eddie Huang <eddie.huang@...iatek.com>,
"matthias.bgg@...il.com" <matthias.bgg@...il.com>,
"treding@...dia.com" <treding@...dia.com>,
"mark.rutland@....com" <mark.rutland@....com>,
"robh@...nel.org" <robh@...nel.org>,
"robin.murphy@....com" <robin.murphy@....com>,
"p.zabel@...gutronix.de" <p.zabel@...gutronix.de>,
"devicetree@...r.kernel.org" <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
"pebolle@...cali.nl" <pebolle@...cali.nl>,
Kendrick Hsu (徐子凡)
<Kendrick.Hsu@...iatek.com>, "arnd@...db.de" <arnd@...db.de>,
srv_heupstream <srv_heupstream@...iatek.com>,
"catalin.marinas@....com" <catalin.marinas@....com>,
"will.deacon@....com" <will.deacon@....com>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"tfiga@...gle.com" <tfiga@...gle.com>,
"iommu@...ts.linux-foundation.org" <iommu@...ts.linux-foundation.org>,
"robh+dt@...nel.org" <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
"djkurtz@...gle.com" <djkurtz@...gle.com>,
"kernel@...gutronix.de" <kernel@...gutronix.de>,
"linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org"
<linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org>,
"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
"l.stach@...gutronix.de" <l.stach@...gutronix.de>,
Yingjoe Chen (??英洲)
<Yingjoe.Chen@...iatek.com>,
Youlin Pei (裴友林)
<youlin.pei@...iatek.com>,
Erin Lo (?_雅?g)
<erin.lo@...iatek.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 5/5] ARM: dts: mt2701: add iommu/smi dtsi node for
mt2701
On Wed, 2016-06-22 at 10:31 +0200, Joerg Roedel wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 22, 2016 at 03:45:47PM +0800, Honghui Zhang wrote:
> > This one is based on CCF "arm: dts: mt2701: Add clock controller device
> > nodes"[1] and power domain patch "Mediatek MT2701 SCPSYS power domain
> > support v7"[2],
> > But these two patchset are still being review now.
> >
> > Do you think it's better that I send this one later after ccf and power
> > domain patch got merged, and let Matthias take it?
>
> Sure, but the patches I already merged can stay in the tree for now?
>
>
I think that driver and dtsi could merged separately, I would prefer
those previous patches stay in the tree if it's OK for you.
Thanks.
>
> Joerg
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists