[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <32739965.DkybxvdJlf@wuerfel>
Date: Wed, 22 Jun 2016 12:15:17 +0200
From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: Alexander Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>,
Theodore Ts'o <tytso@....edu>,
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...hat.com>,
linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] compat: remove compat_printk
On Tuesday, June 21, 2016 4:38:57 PM CEST Andrew Morton wrote:
> > @@ -1077,15 +1076,6 @@ static struct ctl_table kern_table[] = {
> > .extra1 = &neg_one,
> > },
> > #endif
> > -#ifdef CONFIG_COMPAT
> > - {
> > - .procname = "compat-log",
> > - .data = &compat_log,
> > - .maxlen = sizeof (int),
> > - .mode = 0644,
> > - .proc_handler = proc_dointvec,
> > - },
> > -#endif
>
> How do we know we can simply remove /proc/sys/kernel/compat-log without
> breaking any userspace?
>
Good point. I guess we can leave this in place just in case (with a comment)
and just remove the compat_printk function. We could probably have a Kconfig
symbol for obsolete sysctl files, but if this is the only one controlled
by it, it's probably not worth the effort.
Arnd
Powered by blists - more mailing lists