[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20160623083500.GO1868@techsingularity.net>
Date: Thu, 23 Jun 2016 09:35:01 +0100
From: Mel Gorman <mgorman@...hsingularity.net>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: Linux-MM <linux-mm@...ck.org>, Rik van Riel <riel@...riel.com>,
Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@...e.cz>,
Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 16/27] mm: Move page mapped accounting to the node
On Tue, Jun 21, 2016 at 03:32:06PM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Tue, 21 Jun 2016 15:15:55 +0100 Mel Gorman <mgorman@...hsingularity.net> wrote:
>
> > Reclaim makes decisions based on the number of pages that are mapped
> > but it's mixing node and zone information. Account NR_FILE_MAPPED and
> > NR_ANON_PAGES pages on the node.
>
> <wading through rejects>
>
> Boy, the difference between
>
> __mod_zone_page_state(page_zone(page), ...
>
> and
>
> __mod_node_page_state(page_pgdat(page), ...
>
> is looking subtle. When and why to use one versus the other. I'm not
> seeing any explanation of this in there but haven't yet looked hard.
>
I'm not sure I see the problem. One applies for zone stats and the other
is for node. Granted, care is needed to use the correct one or a random
stat is updated instead of the one intended.
--
Mel Gorman
SUSE Labs
Powered by blists - more mailing lists