lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20160623102648.GP1868@techsingularity.net>
Date:	Thu, 23 Jun 2016 11:26:48 +0100
From:	Mel Gorman <mgorman@...hsingularity.net>
To:	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Linux-MM <linux-mm@...ck.org>
Cc:	Rik van Riel <riel@...riel.com>, Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@...e.cz>,
	Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>,
	Michal Hocko <mhocko@...nel.org>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/27] Move LRU page reclaim from zones to nodes v7

On Tue, Jun 21, 2016 at 03:15:39PM +0100, Mel Gorman wrote:
> The bulk of the updates are in response to review from Vlastimil Babka
> and received a lot more testing than v6.
> 

Hi Andrew,

Please drop these patches again from mmotm.

There has been a number of odd conflicts resulting in at least one major
bug where a node-counter is used on a zone that will result in random
behaviour. Some of the additional feedback is non-trivial and all of it
will need to be resolved against the OOM detection rework and the huge
tmpfs implementation.

It'll take time to resolve this and I don't want to leave mmotm in a
broken state in the meantime. I have a copy of mmots so I have the conflict
resolutions you already applied.

Thanks.

-- 
Mel Gorman
SUSE Labs

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ