linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 00/27] Move LRU page reclaim from zones to nodes v7

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Thu, 23 Jun 2016 13:27:14 +0200
From:	Michal Hocko <mhocko@...nel.org>
To:	Mel Gorman <mgorman@...hsingularity.net>
Cc:	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Linux-MM <linux-mm@...ck.org>, Rik van Riel <riel@...riel.com>,
	Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@...e.cz>,
	Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/27] Move LRU page reclaim from zones to nodes v7

On Thu 23-06-16 11:26:48, Mel Gorman wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 21, 2016 at 03:15:39PM +0100, Mel Gorman wrote:
> > The bulk of the updates are in response to review from Vlastimil Babka
> > and received a lot more testing than v6.
> > 
> 
> Hi Andrew,
> 
> Please drop these patches again from mmotm.
> 
> There has been a number of odd conflicts resulting in at least one major
> bug where a node-counter is used on a zone that will result in random
> behaviour. Some of the additional feedback is non-trivial and all of it
> will need to be resolved against the OOM detection rework and the huge
> tmpfs implementation.

FWIW I haven't spotted any obvious misbehaving wrt. the OOM detection
rework. You have kept the per-zone counters which are used for the retry
logic so I think we should be safe. I am still reading through the
series though.

-- 
Michal Hocko
SUSE Labs