linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] staging: wilc1000: fix error handling in wilc_debugfs

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAGRGNgW52h=X1_Pac+VJKmpBC_MODzu00JnfDOk180FYmvPKyg@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Thu, 23 Jun 2016 21:29:30 +1000
From:	Julian Calaby <julian.calaby@...il.com>
To:	Luis de Bethencourt <luisbg@....samsung.com>
Cc:	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Johnny Kim <johnny.kim@...el.com>,
	Austin Shin <austin.shin@...el.com>,
	Chris Park <chris.park@...el.com>,
	Tony Cho <tony.cho@...el.com>, Glen Lee <glen.lee@...el.com>,
	Leo Kim <leo.kim@...el.com>,
	Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
	linux-wireless <linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org>,
	"devel@...verdev.osuosl.org" <devel@...verdev.osuosl.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] staging: wilc1000: fix error handling in wilc_debugfs_init()

Hi Luis,

On Thu, Jun 23, 2016 at 9:25 PM, Luis de Bethencourt
<luisbg@....samsung.com> wrote:
> On 23/06/16 02:29, Julian Calaby wrote:
>> Hi All,
>>
>> On Wed, Jun 22, 2016 at 10:39 PM, Luis de Bethencourt
>> <luisbg@....samsung.com> wrote:
>>> The common format to check if a function returned an error pointer is to
>>> use PTR_ERR(). Instead of ERR_PTR() which is used to return said errors.
>>>
>>> Also, if there was an error returning -EINVAL instead of -1 is more
>>> appropriate.
>>
>> These two changes could be argued to be separate changes deserving of
>> their own patches.
>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Luis de Bethencourt <luisbg@....samsung.com>
>>
>> However if everyone else is ok with that, this is:
>>
>> Reviewed-by: Julian Calaby <julian.calaby@...il.com>
>>
>> Thanks,
>>
>
> Hi Julian,
>
> If you don't mind I will resend as two separate patches and include your
> Reviewed-by in both.

Providing there are no changes other than rebasing and splitting, I'm
fine with that.,

Thanks,

-- 
Julian Calaby

Email: julian.calaby@...il.com
Profile: http://www.google.com/profiles/julian.calaby/