[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <576BC73B.9070503@osg.samsung.com>
Date: Thu, 23 Jun 2016 12:25:47 +0100
From: Luis de Bethencourt <luisbg@....samsung.com>
To: Julian Calaby <julian.calaby@...il.com>
CC: "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Johnny Kim <johnny.kim@...el.com>,
Austin Shin <austin.shin@...el.com>,
Chris Park <chris.park@...el.com>,
Tony Cho <tony.cho@...el.com>, Glen Lee <glen.lee@...el.com>,
Leo Kim <leo.kim@...el.com>,
Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
linux-wireless <linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org>,
"devel@...verdev.osuosl.org" <devel@...verdev.osuosl.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] staging: wilc1000: fix error handling in wilc_debugfs_init()
On 23/06/16 02:29, Julian Calaby wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> On Wed, Jun 22, 2016 at 10:39 PM, Luis de Bethencourt
> <luisbg@....samsung.com> wrote:
>> The common format to check if a function returned an error pointer is to
>> use PTR_ERR(). Instead of ERR_PTR() which is used to return said errors.
>>
>> Also, if there was an error returning -EINVAL instead of -1 is more
>> appropriate.
>
> These two changes could be argued to be separate changes deserving of
> their own patches.
>
>> Signed-off-by: Luis de Bethencourt <luisbg@....samsung.com>
>
> However if everyone else is ok with that, this is:
>
> Reviewed-by: Julian Calaby <julian.calaby@...il.com>
>
> Thanks,
>
Hi Julian,
If you don't mind I will resend as two separate patches and include your
Reviewed-by in both.
Thanks for the review,
Luis
Powered by blists - more mailing lists