[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAGRGNgUoptASqK7jD-K-=zp7eYbJDq+2+u7mj_MabaGtOb9=kQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 23 Jun 2016 11:29:45 +1000
From: Julian Calaby <julian.calaby@...il.com>
To: Luis de Bethencourt <luisbg@....samsung.com>
Cc: "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Johnny Kim <johnny.kim@...el.com>,
Austin Shin <austin.shin@...el.com>,
Chris Park <chris.park@...el.com>,
Tony Cho <tony.cho@...el.com>, Glen Lee <glen.lee@...el.com>,
Leo Kim <leo.kim@...el.com>,
Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
linux-wireless <linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org>,
"devel@...verdev.osuosl.org" <devel@...verdev.osuosl.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] staging: wilc1000: fix error handling in wilc_debugfs_init()
Hi All,
On Wed, Jun 22, 2016 at 10:39 PM, Luis de Bethencourt
<luisbg@....samsung.com> wrote:
> The common format to check if a function returned an error pointer is to
> use PTR_ERR(). Instead of ERR_PTR() which is used to return said errors.
>
> Also, if there was an error returning -EINVAL instead of -1 is more
> appropriate.
These two changes could be argued to be separate changes deserving of
their own patches.
> Signed-off-by: Luis de Bethencourt <luisbg@....samsung.com>
However if everyone else is ok with that, this is:
Reviewed-by: Julian Calaby <julian.calaby@...il.com>
Thanks,
--
Julian Calaby
Email: julian.calaby@...il.com
Profile: http://www.google.com/profiles/julian.calaby/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists