[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20160624202131.GB8399@intel.com>
Date: Fri, 24 Jun 2016 23:21:31 +0300
From: Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko.sakkinen@...ux.intel.com>
To: Jason Gunthorpe <jgunthorpe@...idianresearch.com>
Cc: Ed Swierk <eswierk@...portsystems.com>,
tpmdd-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-security-module@...r.kernel.org, stefanb@...ibm.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v8 1/5] tpm_tis: Improve reporting of IO errors
Hi Jason,
On Fri, Jun 24, 2016 at 12:25:15PM -0600, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
> > expected = be32_to_cpu(*(__be32 *) (buf + 2));
> > if (expected > count) {
> > + dev_err(chip->pdev, "Response too long (wanted %zd, got %d)\n",
> > + count, expected);
>
> This all needs to be rebased on Jarkko's tree I guess, chip->pdev is
> gone now.
>
> http://git.infradead.org/users/jjs/linux-tpmdd.git/shortlog/refs/heads/master
>
> Jarkko, did you miss a pull request for 4.7 or something? This is
> 4 month old stuff???
Hmm... Do you mean by 4 month old stuff the stuff that is in mainline
and not in my master branch?
I'm not sure what happened with 4.7. I merged the changes for in about
4.6-rc5. There was one issue that I fixed that Stephen reported.
At the moment linux-next seems contain the stuff that I have in my
next.
> Jason
/Jarkko
Powered by blists - more mailing lists