linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v3 00/13] Virtually mapped stacks with guard pages (x86, core)

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Fri, 24 Jun 2016 22:22:55 +0200
From:	Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>
To:	Michal Hocko <mhocko@...nel.org>
Cc:	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Andy Lutomirski <luto@...capital.net>,
	Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>,
	the arch/x86 maintainers <x86@...nel.org>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	"linux-arch@...r.kernel.org" <linux-arch@...r.kernel.org>,
	Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
	Nadav Amit <nadav.amit@...il.com>,
	Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>,
	Brian Gerst <brgerst@...il.com>,
	"kernel-hardening@...ts.openwall.com" 
	<kernel-hardening@...ts.openwall.com>,
	Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@...hat.com>,
	Jann Horn <jann@...jh.net>,
	Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@...ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 00/13] Virtually mapped stacks with guard pages
	(x86, core)

On 06/24, Michal Hocko wrote:
>
> On Fri 24-06-16 16:05:58, Michal Hocko wrote:
> > On Thu 23-06-16 20:52:21, Oleg Nesterov wrote:
> > >
> > > But I agree, this is fixable (and in fact I still hope TIF_MEMDIE will die,
> > > at least in its current form).
> >
> > We can move the flag to the task_struct.

Well, I actually meant that to me its usage doesn't look really
right and we need to change this logic. But this is off-topic.

> Here is the patch.

Can't comment, but note that it was decided to move ti->flags into
task_struct, so the patch is "off-topic" too ;)

> @@ -1856,6 +1856,8 @@ struct task_struct {
>  	unsigned long	task_state_change;
>  #endif
>  	int pagefault_disabled;
> +	/* oom victim - give it access to memory reserves */
> +	atomic_t	memdie;

Yet another oom member. And these atomic_add_unless's look a bit
strange, it seems that you could add "bool memdie" and use xchg()
with the same effect?

Oleg.