linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 1/3] spi: spidev: fix the check for spidev in dt

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20160626110514.GI28202@sirena.org.uk>
Date:	Sun, 26 Jun 2016 12:05:14 +0100
From:	Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
To:	Michal Suchanek <hramrach@...il.com>
Cc:	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
	Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com>,
	Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>,
	"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	Davidlohr Bueso <dave@...olabs.net>,
	Andrey Ryabinin <aryabinin@...tuozzo.com>,
	Nikolay Aleksandrov <nikolay@...ulusnetworks.com>,
	Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@...gle.com>,
	Adrien Schildknecht <adrien+dev@...ischi.me>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	linux-spi <linux-spi@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] spi: spidev: fix the check for spidev in dt

On Sun, Jun 26, 2016 at 04:12:10AM +0200, Michal Suchanek wrote:
> On 26 June 2016 at 03:13, Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org> wrote:
> > On Thu, Jun 23, 2016 at 05:41:19PM -0000, Michal Suchanek wrote:

> >> The check is supposed to warn about spidev specified directly in
> >> devicetree as compatible. This just does not work. I have a devicetree
> >> with no compatible whatsoever and hacked my kernel so I can manually
> >> bind spidev. This still triggers.

> > Well, a DT device won't instantiate without a compatible string...
> > could you please explain exactly what makes you say this won't work?

> That's because the whitelist concept for this check is completely broken.

> Without any patches whatsoever I should be able to specify m25p80
> binding in the DT, let the kernel create the device, unbind the
> driver, and bind spidev.

> Then I have the jedec,spi-nor compatible which is not on the whitelist.

So, none of that is in the changelog where it needs to be and it only
makes sense if we adopt the very specific solution you are proposing.
You need to describe this change properly and you need to put it at the
end of the patch series were it makes sense.

Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (474 bytes)