[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <0158A29DB680F54A88142ED28D55B1D0082471DA@PGSMSX107.gar.corp.intel.com>
Date: Tue, 28 Jun 2016 07:44:37 +0000
From: "Tan, Jui Nee" <jui.nee.tan@...el.com>
To: Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@...ux.intel.com>
CC: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>,
"heikki.krogerus@...ux.intel.com" <heikki.krogerus@...ux.intel.com>,
"tglx@...utronix.de" <tglx@...utronix.de>,
"mingo@...hat.com" <mingo@...hat.com>,
"hpa@...or.com" <hpa@...or.com>, "x86@...nel.org" <x86@...nel.org>,
"ptyser@...-inc.com" <ptyser@...-inc.com>,
"lee.jones@...aro.org" <lee.jones@...aro.org>,
"linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org" <linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
"Yong, Jonathan" <jonathan.yong@...el.com>,
"Yu, Ong Hock" <ong.hock.yu@...el.com>,
"Voon, Weifeng" <weifeng.voon@...el.com>,
"Wan Mohamad, Wan Ahmad Zainie"
<wan.ahmad.zainie.wan.mohamad@...el.com>
Subject: RE: [PATCH v3 2/3] x86/platform/p2sb: New Primary to Sideband
bridge support driver for Intel SOC's
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Mika Westerberg [mailto:mika.westerberg@...ux.intel.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, June 21, 2016 3:24 PM
> To: Tan, Jui Nee <jui.nee.tan@...el.com>
> Cc: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>;
> heikki.krogerus@...ux.intel.com; tglx@...utronix.de; mingo@...hat.com;
> hpa@...or.com; x86@...nel.org; ptyser@...-inc.com;
> lee.jones@...aro.org; linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org; linux-
> kernel@...r.kernel.org; Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>; Yong,
> Jonathan <jonathan.yong@...el.com>; Yu, Ong Hock
> <ong.hock.yu@...el.com>; Voon, Weifeng <weifeng.voon@...el.com>; Wan
> Mohamad, Wan Ahmad Zainie
> <wan.ahmad.zainie.wan.mohamad@...el.com>
> Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 2/3] x86/platform/p2sb: New Primary to Sideband
> bridge support driver for Intel SOC's
>
> On Tue, Jun 21, 2016 at 05:03:20AM +0000, Tan, Jui Nee wrote:
> > > Maybe, or make it modular and use MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(x86cpu, ...)
> > > to match the corresponding CPUs.
> >
> > We need CONFIG_X86_INTEL_NON_ACPI Kconfig option to select
> CONFIG_PINCTRL.
> > This is to solve kbuidbot complaint about kernel configuration, i.e.
> > CONFIG_PINCTRL=n. Appreciate if you could advise something on this.
>
> Good point.
>
> Then I guess you might add similar Kconfig option but can you call it
> something else than CONFIG_X86_INTEL_NON_ACPI. Perhaps something
> that relates to the actual product so distro people can then decide whether
> they want to support it or not. Along the lines of CONFIG_X86_INTEL_CE and
> so on.
Thanks for your suggestion. CONFIG_X86_INTEL_NON_ACPI will be renamed
to CONFIG_X86_INTEL_APL in next patch-set.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists