[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <57723FD5.8050305@ti.com>
Date: Tue, 28 Jun 2016 12:13:57 +0300
From: Roger Quadros <rogerq@...com>
To: Stephen Boyd <stephen.boyd@...aro.org>,
Chanwoo Choi <cw00.choi@...sung.com>
CC: <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] extcon: Add support for qcom SPMI PMIC USB id detection
hardware
On 28/06/16 11:47, Stephen Boyd wrote:
> Quoting Roger Quadros (2016-06-27 23:36:26)
>> On 27/06/16 22:30, Stephen Boyd wrote:
>>>
>>> The VBUS notification is done through another piece of hardware. In this
>>> case it's done by the charger module. I've sent a patch for that[1].
>>
>> Isn't it better if ID event is handled as well in that PMIC driver instead of
>> creating a separate one here?
>>
>> Why do you need ID to be handled outside of the PMIC driver?
>> You mentioned earlier that some Qualcomm PMICs have ID detection.
>
> Sorry I must have confused you. There are two modules in the PMIC that
> are doing detection here. The charger module is detecting the VBUS event
> and this misc module is detecting the ID pin. I'm not sure why they're
> two different blocks, but it is what it is in the hardware.
>
OK. Can the MISC block do anything else other than USB ID?
Does the USB ID interrupt come on a different line than the charger interrupt?
It would be more like MISC block interrupt than USB ID interrupt right?
cheers,
-roger
Powered by blists - more mailing lists