[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.20.1606281651130.25214@digraph.polyomino.org.uk>
Date: Tue, 28 Jun 2016 16:57:31 +0000
From: Joseph Myers <joseph@...esourcery.com>
To: Yury Norov <ynorov@...iumnetworks.com>
CC: <libc-alpha@...rceware.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
<arnd@...db.de>, <catalin.marinas@....com>,
<marcus.shawcroft@....com>, <philb@....org>, <davem@...emloft.net>,
<szabolcs.nagy@....com>, <maxim.kuvyrkov@...aro.org>,
<pinskia@...il.com>, <bamvor.zhangjian@...wei.com>,
<schwab@...e.de>, <fweimer@...hat.com>, <Prasun.Kapoor@...ium.com>,
<cmetcalf@...lanox.com>, <hjl.tools@...il.com>,
<adhemerval.zanella@...aro.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC2 PATCH 00/23] ARM64: support ILP32
On Tue, 28 Jun 2016, Yury Norov wrote:
> - addressed v1 comments (I'm really sorry if I missed something,
> there are a lot of them, and I am really thankfull for detailed review);
You appear to have ignored most of my comments, including comments carried
over from 2014. Please check more thoroughly for any message on
libc-alpha since the first patch series was posted in Oct 2014 that
relates to AArch64 ILP32 patches (both comments on such patch series, and
patches other people posted since the 2014 series that build on top of
it), and make sure that it is addressed. If you think a comment is
incorrect, say so explicitly.
> Tested with LTP. Regressions are like this:
As I said in <https://sourceware.org/ml/libc-alpha/2016-06/msg00780.html>,
test with the glibc testsuite and report the glibc testsuite results.
--
Joseph S. Myers
joseph@...esourcery.com
Powered by blists - more mailing lists