[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20160630073423.GB30114@js1304-P5Q-DELUXE>
Date: Thu, 30 Jun 2016 16:34:24 +0900
From: Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@....com>
To: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@...e.cz>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
rientjes@...gle.com, hughd@...gle.com, mgorman@...hsingularity.net,
minchan@...nel.org, stable@...r.kernel.org,
mm-commits@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [merged] mm-compaction-abort-free-scanner-if-split-fails.patch
removed from -mm tree
On Wed, Jun 29, 2016 at 12:05:09PM +0200, Vlastimil Babka wrote:
> On 06/29/2016 10:12 AM, Joonsoo Kim wrote:
> >>@@ -1035,8 +1034,12 @@ static void isolate_freepages(struct com
> >> continue;
> >>
> >> /* Found a block suitable for isolating free pages from. */
> >>- isolate_freepages_block(cc, &isolate_start_pfn,
> >>- block_end_pfn, freelist, false);
> >>+ isolated = isolate_freepages_block(cc, &isolate_start_pfn,
> >>+ block_end_pfn, freelist, false);
> >>+ /* If isolation failed early, do not continue needlessly */
> >>+ if (!isolated && isolate_start_pfn < block_end_pfn &&
> >>+ cc->nr_migratepages > cc->nr_freepages)
> >>+ break;
> >
> >Hello, David.
> >
> >Minchan found the bug on this patch.
>
> Was it reported in some mail to linux-mm before the patch was sent
> to Linus, or just now?
Unfortunately, we found it yesterday and discussed it in offline.
Thanks.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists